System and method for verifying an aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing

ABSTRACT

A system and method for verifying an aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing is presented. The system comprises a computing device configured to identify an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components, wherein each aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components is associated with a component identifier and verify the aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing as a function of the component identifier.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the field of aircrafts. In particular, the present invention is directed to a system and method for verifying an aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing.

BACKGROUND

Immutable sequential listings are a useful and efficient way to securely upload, collect, store, and validate sensitive information, such as manufactured parts of an aircraft.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

In an aspect, a system for verifying an aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing is illustrated. The system comprises a computing device configured to identify an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components, wherein each aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components is associated with a component identifier and verify the aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing as a function of the component identifier.

In another aspect, a method for verifying an aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing is shown. The method comprises identifying, at a computing device, an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components, wherein each aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components is associated with a component identifier and verifying, at the computing device, the aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing as a function of the component identifier.

These and other aspects and features of non-limiting embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific non-limiting embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show aspects of one or more embodiments of the invention. However, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a system for verifying an aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing;

FIG. 2 is a diagram representing an exemplary embodiment of an aircraft composed of a plurality of aircraft components;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing an exemplary embodiment of a flight controller;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of an immutable sequential listing;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a machine-learning module;

FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a neural network;

FIG. 7 is a diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a node of a neural network;

FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a method for verifying an aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing; and

FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a computing system that can be used to implement any one or more of the methodologies disclosed herein and any more portions thereof.

The drawings are not necessarily to scale and may be illustrated by phantom lines, diagrammatic representations, and fragmentary views. In certain instances, details that are not necessary for an understanding of the embodiments or that render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

At a high level, aspects of the present disclosure are directed to a system and method for verifying an aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing. Aspects of the present disclosure may include a computing device. Aspects of the present disclosure may include the computing device configured to identify an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components. Aspects of the present disclosure may include each aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components being associated with a component identifier. Aspects of the present disclosure may also include verifying the aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing as a function of the component identifier.

In an embodiment, methods and systems described herein may perform or implement one or more aspects of a cryptographic system. In one embodiment, a cryptographic system is a system that converts data from a first form, known as “plaintext,” which is intelligible when viewed in its intended format, into a second form, known as “ciphertext,” which is not intelligible when viewed in the same way. Ciphertext may be unintelligible in any format unless first converted back to plaintext. In one embodiment, a process of converting plaintext into ciphertext is known as “encryption.” Encryption process may involve the use of a datum, known as an “encryption key,” to alter plaintext. Cryptographic system may also convert ciphertext back into plaintext, which is a process known as “decryption.” Decryption process may involve the use of a datum, known as a “decryption key,” to return the ciphertext to its original plaintext form. In embodiments of cryptographic systems that are “symmetric,” decryption key is essentially the same as encryption key: possession of either key makes it possible to deduce the other key quickly without further secret knowledge. Encryption and decryption keys in symmetric cryptographic systems may be kept secret and shared only with persons or entities that the user of the cryptographic system wishes to be able to decrypt the ciphertext. One example of a symmetric cryptographic system is the Advanced Encryption Standard (“AES”), which arranges plaintext into matrices and then modifies the matrices through repeated permutations and arithmetic operations with an encryption key.

In embodiments of cryptographic systems that are “asymmetric,” either encryption or decryption key cannot be readily deduced without additional secret knowledge, even given the possession of a corresponding decryption or encryption key, respectively; a common example is a “public key cryptographic system,” in which possession of the encryption key does not make it practically feasible to deduce the decryption key, so that the encryption key may safely be made available to the public. An example of a public key cryptographic system is RSA, in which an encryption key involves the use of numbers that are products of very large prime numbers, but a decryption key involves the use of those very large prime numbers, such that deducing the decryption key from the encryption key requires the practically infeasible task of computing the prime factors of a number which is the product of two very large prime numbers. Another example is elliptic curve cryptography, which relies on the fact that given two points P and Q on an elliptic curve over a finite field, and a definition for addition where A+B=−R, the point where a line connecting point A and point B intersects the elliptic curve, where “0,” the identity, is a point at infinity in a projective plane containing the elliptic curve, finding a number k such that adding P to itself k times results in Q is computationally impractical, given correctly selected elliptic curve, finite field, and P and Q.

In some embodiments, systems and methods described herein produce cryptographic hashes, also referred to by the equivalent shorthand term “hashes.” A cryptographic hash, as used herein, is a mathematical representation of a lot of data, such as files or blocks in a block chain as described in further detail below; the mathematical representation is produced by a lossy “one-way” algorithm known as a “hashing algorithm.” Hashing algorithm may be a repeatable process; that is, identical lots of data may produce identical hashes each time they are subjected to a particular hashing algorithm. Because hashing algorithm is a one-way function, it may be impossible to reconstruct a lot of data from a hash produced from the lot of data using the hashing algorithm. In the case of some hashing algorithms, reconstructing the full lot of data from the corresponding hash using a partial set of data from the full lot of data may be possible only by repeatedly guessing at the remaining data and repeating the hashing algorithm; it is thus computationally difficult if not infeasible for a single computer to produce the lot of data, as the statistical likelihood of correctly guessing the missing data may be extremely low. However, the statistical likelihood of a computer of a set of computers simultaneously attempting to guess the missing data within a useful timeframe may be higher, permitting mining protocols as described in further detail below.

In an embodiment, hashing algorithm may demonstrate an “avalanche effect,” whereby even extremely small changes to lot of data produce drastically different hashes. This may thwart attempts to avoid the computational work necessary to recreate a hash by simply inserting a fraudulent datum in data lot, enabling the use of hashing algorithms for “tamper-proofing” data such as data contained in an immutable ledger as described in further detail below. This avalanche or “cascade” effect may be evinced by various hashing processes; persons skilled in the art, upon reading the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various suitable hashing algorithms for purposes described herein. Verification of a hash corresponding to a lot of data may be performed by running the lot of data through a hashing algorithm used to produce the hash. Such verification may be computationally expensive, albeit feasible, potentially adding up to significant processing delays where repeated hashing, or hashing of large quantities of data, is required, for instance as described in further detail below. Examples of hashing programs include, without limitation, SHA256, a NIST standard; further current and past hashing algorithms include Winternitz hashing algorithms, various generations of Secure Hash Algorithm (including “SHA-1,” “SHA-2,” and “SHA-3”), “Message Digest” family hashes such as “MD4,” “MD5,” “MD6,” and “RIPEMD,” Keccak, “BLAKE” hashes and progeny (e.g., “BLAKE2,” “BLAKE-256,” “BLAKE-512,” and the like), Message Authentication Code (“MAC”)-family hash functions such as PMAC, OMAC, VMAC, HMAC, and UMAC, Polyl305-AES, Elliptic Curve Only Hash (“ECOH”) and similar hash functions, Fast-Syndrome-based (FSB) hash functions, GOST hash functions, the Grøstl hash function, the HAS-160 hash function, the JH hash function, the RadioGatnn hash function, the Skein hash function, the Streebog hash function, the SWIFFT hash function, the Tiger hash function, the Whirlpool hash function, or any hash function that satisfies, at the time of implementation, the requirements that a cryptographic hash be deterministic, infeasible to reverse-hash, infeasible to find collisions, and have the property that small changes to an original message to be hashed will change the resulting hash so extensively that the original hash and the new hash appear uncorrelated to each other. A degree of security of a hash function in practice may depend both on the hash function itself and on characteristics of the message and/or digest used in the hash function. For example, where a message is random, for a hash function that fulfills collision-resistance requirements, a brute-force or “birthday attack” may to detect collision may be on the order of O(2^(n/2)) for n output bits; thus, it may take on the order of 2²⁵⁶ operations to locate a collision in a 512 bit output “Dictionary” attacks on hashes likely to have been generated from a non-random original text can have a lower computational complexity, because the space of entries they are guessing is far smaller than the space containing all random permutations of bits. However, the space of possible messages may be augmented by increasing the length or potential length of a possible message, or by implementing a protocol whereby one or more randomly selected strings or sets of data are added to the message, rendering a dictionary attack significantly less effective.

In some embodiments, systems and methods described herein may include a secure proof A “secure proof,” as used in this disclosure, is a protocol whereby an output is generated that demonstrates possession of a secret, such as device-specific secret, without demonstrating the entirety of the device-specific secret; in other words, a secure proof by itself, is insufficient to reconstruct the entire device-specific secret, enabling the production of at least another secure proof using at least a device-specific secret. A secure proof may be referred to as a “proof of possession” or “proof of knowledge” of a secret. Where at least a device-specific secret is a plurality of secrets, such as a plurality of challenge-response pairs, a secure proof may include an output that reveals the entirety of one of the plurality of secrets, but not all of the plurality of secrets; for instance, secure proof may be a response contained in one challenge-response pair. In an embodiment, proof may not be secure; in other words, proof may include a one-time revelation of at least a device-specific secret, for instance as used in a single challenge-response exchange.

Secure proof may include a zero-knowledge proof, which may provide an output demonstrating possession of a secret while revealing none of the secret to a recipient of the output; zero-knowledge proof may be information-theoretically secure, meaning that an entity with infinite computing power would be unable to determine secret from output. Alternatively, zero-knowledge proof may be computationally secure, meaning that determination of secret from output is computationally infeasible, for instance to the same extent that determination of a private key from a public key in a public key cryptographic system is computationally infeasible. Zero-knowledge proof algorithms may generally include a set of two algorithms, a prover algorithm, or “P,” which is used to prove computational integrity and/or possession of a secret, and a verifier algorithm, or “V” whereby a party may check the validity of P. Zero-knowledge proof may include an interactive zero-knowledge proof, wherein a party verifying the proof must directly interact with the proving party; for instance, the verifying and proving parties may be required to be online, or connected to the same network as each other, at the same time. Interactive zero-knowledge proof may include a “proof of knowledge” proof, such as a Schnorr algorithm for proof on knowledge of a discrete logarithm. in a Schnorr algorithm, a prover commits to a randomness r, generates a message based on r, and generates a message adding r to a challenge c multiplied by a discrete logarithm that the prover is able to calculate; verification is performed by the verifier who produced c by exponentiation, thus checking the validity of the discrete logarithm. Interactive zero-knowledge proofs may alternatively or additionally include sigma protocols. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various alternative interactive zero-knowledge proofs that may be implemented consistently with this disclosure.

Alternatively, zero-knowledge proof may include a non-interactive zero-knowledge, proof, or a proof wherein neither party to the proof interacts with the other party to the proof, for instance, each of a party receiving the proof and a party providing the proof may receive a reference datum which the party providing the proof may modify or otherwise use to perform the proof. As a non-limiting example, zero-knowledge proof may include a succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (ZK-SNARKS) proof, wherein a “trusted setup” process creates proof and verification keys using secret (and subsequently discarded) information encoded using a public key cryptographic system, a prover runs a proving algorithm using the proving key and secret information available to the prover, and a verifier checks the proof using the verification key; public key cryptographic system may include RSA, elliptic curve cryptography, ElGamal, or any other suitable public key cryptographic system. Generation of trusted setup may be performed using a secure multiparty computation so that no one party has control of the totality of the secret information used in the trusted setup; as a result, if any one party generating the trusted setup is trustworthy, the secret information may be unrecoverable by malicious parties. As another non-limiting example, non-interactive zero-knowledge proof may include a Succinct Transparent Arguments of Knowledge (ZK-STARKS) zero-knowledge proof. In an embodiment, a ZK-STARKS proof includes a Merkle root of a Merkle tree representing evaluation of a secret computation at some number of points, which may be 1 billion points, plus Merkle branches representing evaluations at a set of randomly selected points of the number of points; verification may include determining that Merkle branches provided match the Merkle root, and that point verifications at those branches represent valid values, where validity is shown by demonstrating that all values belong to the same polynomial created by transforming the secret computation. In an embodiment, ZK-STARKS does not require a trusted setup.

Zero-knowledge proof may include any other suitable zero-knowledge proof. Zero-knowledge proof may include, without limitation bulletproofs. Zero-knowledge proof may include a homomorphic public-key cryptography (hPKC)-based proof Zero-knowledge proof may include a discrete logarithmic problem (DLP) proof. Zero-knowledge proof may include a secure multi-party computation (MPC) proof Zero-knowledge proof may include, without limitation, an incrementally verifiable computation (IVC). Zero-knowledge proof may include an interactive oracle proof (IOP). Zero-knowledge proof may include a proof based on the probabilistically checkable proof (PCP) theorem, including a linear PCP (LPCP) proof. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various forms of zero-knowledge proofs that may be used, singly or in combination, consistently with this disclosure.

In an embodiment, secure proof may be implemented using a challenge-response protocol. In an embodiment, this may function as a one-time pad implementation; for instance, a manufacturer or other trusted party may record a series of outputs (“responses”) produced by a device possessing secret information, given a series of corresponding inputs (“challenges”), and store them securely. In an embodiment, a challenge-response protocol may be combined with key generation. A single key may be used in one or more digital signatures as described in further detail below, such as signatures used to receive and/or transfer possession of crypto-currency assets; the key may be discarded for future use after a set period of time. In an embodiment, varied inputs include variations in local physical parameters, such as fluctuations in local electromagnetic fields, radiation, temperature, and the like, such that an almost limitless variety of private keys may be so generated. Secure proof may include encryption of a challenge to produce the response, indicating possession of a secret key. Encryption may be performed using a private key of a public key cryptographic system, or using a private key of a symmetric cryptographic system; for instance, trusted party may verify response by decrypting an encryption of challenge or of another datum using either a symmetric or public-key cryptographic system, verifying that a stored key matches the key used for encryption as a function of at least a device-specific secret. Keys may be generated by random variation in selection of prime numbers, for instance for the purposes of a cryptographic system such as RSA that relies prime factoring difficulty. Keys may be generated by randomized selection of parameters for a seed in a cryptographic system, such as elliptic curve cryptography, which is generated from a seed. Keys may be used to generate exponents for a cryptographic system such as Diffie-Helman or ElGamal that are based on the discrete logarithm problem.

Furthermore, in some embodiments, systems and methods described herein may produce digital signatures. A “digital signature,” as used herein, includes a secure proof of possession of a secret by a signing device, as performed on provided element of data, known as a “message.” A message may include an encrypted mathematical representation of a file or other set of data using the private key of a public key cryptographic system. Secure proof may include any form of secure proof as described above, including without limitation encryption using a private key of a public key cryptographic system as described above. Signature may be verified using a verification datum suitable for verification of a secure proof; for instance, where secure proof is enacted by encrypting message using a private key of a public key cryptographic system, verification may include decrypting the encrypted message using the corresponding public key and comparing the decrypted representation to a purported match that was not encrypted; if the signature protocol is well-designed and implemented correctly, this means the ability to create the digital signature is equivalent to possession of the private decryption key and/or device-specific secret. Likewise, if a message making up a mathematical representation of file is well-designed and implemented correctly, any alteration of the file may result in a mismatch with the digital signature; the mathematical representation may be produced using an alteration-sensitive, reliably reproducible algorithm, such as a hashing algorithm as described above. A mathematical representation to which the signature may be compared may be included with signature, for verification purposes; in other embodiments, the algorithm used to produce the mathematical representation may be publicly available, permitting the easy reproduction of the mathematical representation corresponding to any file.

In some embodiments, digital signatures may be combined with or incorporated in digital certificates. In one embodiment, a digital certificate is a file that conveys information and links the conveyed information to a “certificate authority” that is the issuer of a public key in a public key cryptographic system. Certificate authority in some embodiments contains data conveying the certificate authority's authorization for the recipient to perform a task. The authorization may be the authorization to access a given datum. The authorization may be the authorization to access a given process. In some embodiments, the certificate may identify the certificate authority. The digital certificate may include a digital signature.

In some embodiments, a third party such as a certificate authority (CA) is available to verify that the possessor of the private key is a particular entity; thus, if the certificate authority may be trusted, and the private key has not been stolen, the ability of an entity to produce a digital signature confirms the identity of the entity and links the file to the entity in a verifiable way. Digital signature may be incorporated in a digital certificate, which is a document authenticating the entity possessing the private key by authority of the issuing certificate authority and signed with a digital signature created with that private key and a mathematical representation of the remainder of the certificate. In other embodiments, digital signature is verified by comparing the digital signature to one known to have been created by the entity that purportedly signed the digital signature; for instance, if the public key that decrypts the known signature also decrypts the digital signature, the digital signature may be considered verified. Digital signature may also be used to verify that the file has not been altered since the formation of the digital signature.

Referring now to FIG. 1 , a system 100 for verifying an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 on an immutable sequential listing 120. System includes a computing device 104. Computing device 104 may include any computing device as described in this disclosure, including without limitation a microcontroller, microprocessor, digital signal processor (DSP) and/or system on a chip (SoC) as described in this disclosure. Computing device 104 may include, be included in, and/or communicate with a mobile device such as a mobile telephone or smartphone. Computing device 104 may include a single computing device operating independently, or may include two or more computing device operating in concert, in parallel, sequentially or the like; two or more computing devices may be included together in a single computing device or in two or more computing devices. Computing device 104 may interface or communicate with one or more additional devices as described below in further detail via a network interface device. Network interface device may be utilized for connecting computing device 104 to one or more of a variety of networks, and one or more devices. Examples of a network interface device include, but are not limited to, a network interface card (e.g., a mobile network interface card, a LAN card), a modem, and any combination thereof. Examples of a network include, but are not limited to, a wide area network (e.g., the Internet, an enterprise network), a local area network (e.g., a network associated with an office, a building, a campus or other relatively small geographic space), a telephone network, a data network associated with a telephone/voice provider (e.g., a mobile communications provider data and/or voice network), a direct connection between two computing devices, and any combinations thereof. A network may employ a wired and/or a wireless mode of communication. In general, any network topology may be used. Information (e.g., data, software etc.) may be communicated to and/or from a computer and/or a computing device. Computing device 104 may include but is not limited to, for example, a computing device or cluster of computing devices in a first location and a second computing device or cluster of computing devices in a second location. Computing device 104 may include one or more computing devices dedicated to data storage, security, distribution of traffic for load balancing, and the like. Computing device 104 may distribute one or more computing tasks as described below across a plurality of computing devices of computing device, which may operate in parallel, in series, redundantly, or in any other manner used for distribution of tasks or memory between computing devices. Computing device 104 may be implemented using a “shared nothing” architecture in which data is cached at the worker, in an embodiment, this may enable scalability of system 100 and/or computing device.

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , computing device 104 may be designed and/or configured to perform any method, method step, or sequence of method steps in any embodiment described in this disclosure, in any order and with any degree of repetition. For instance, Computing device 104 may be configured to perform a single step or sequence repeatedly until a desired or commanded outcome is achieved; repetition of a step or a sequence of steps may be performed iteratively and/or recursively using outputs of previous repetitions as inputs to subsequent repetitions, aggregating inputs and/or outputs of repetitions to produce an aggregate result, reduction or decrement of one or more variables such as global variables, and/or division of a larger processing task into a set of iteratively addressed smaller processing tasks. Computing device 104 may perform any step or sequence of steps as described in this disclosure in parallel, such as simultaneously and/or substantially simultaneously performing a step two or more times using two or more parallel threads, processor cores, or the like; division of tasks between parallel threads and/or processes may be performed according to any protocol suitable for division of tasks between iterations. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which steps, sequences of steps, processing tasks, and/or data may be subdivided, shared, or otherwise dealt with using iteration, recursion, and/or parallel processing.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , computing device 104 may be configured to identify a plurality of aircraft components 108. Identifying the plurality of aircraft components 108 may include receiving aircraft component data associated with the plurality of aircrafts. As used herein in this disclosure, “aircraft component data” is information pertaining to one or more parts, components, or systems of an aircraft. Aircraft component data may comprise information relating to an aircraft component. An “aircraft component” is an article or component approved for installation on a type-certificated aircraft. Aircraft component data may include, but is not limited to, battery temperature, battery health, battery charge, battery current, battery voltage, aircraft altitude, aircraft velocity, aircraft acceleration, rotor torque, aircraft power systems, and the like. Aircraft component data may be received from a sensor or manually inputted into computing device 104. Aircraft component may be any of the components as described herein with reference to FIG. 3 and aircraft component data may be any of the information as described herein with reference to FIG. 3 .

Continuing to refer to FIG. 1 , aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 may include a software module. As used herein, a “software module” is a component or part of a computer program that contains one or more routines. One or more independently developed modules may make up a program. Software module may comprise a system design or code describing the aircraft component its associated with of the plurality of aircraft components 108. Software module may include, but without limitation, a battery module, aircraft module, historical event module, training module, propulsor module, monitoring module, or any other types of modules associated with an aircraft component. Software module is further described herein below.

Furthermore, computing device 104 is configured to assign a component identifier 112 to each aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108. A “component identifier” as used in this specification is a unique, non-changing alphanumeric set of characters of any length for each aircraft component. Component identifier 112 may link an aircraft component to an aircraft, or other aircraft component groups. Component identifier 112 may include a specific sequence of characters, numbers, letters, and/or words that may identify an aircraft component. Component identifier 112 may include a globally recognized uniform identifier such as a uniform code commission (UCC) barcode. Component identifier 112 may also include a serial number. For example and without limitation, component identifier 112 may include name, aircraft number, composition, weight, important dates in the manufacturing process, test results, etc. Component identifier 112 may be directly entered into computing device 104. For example, a barcode reader or an electronic pen may be used to enter component identifier directly into computing device 104. Moreover, in a non-limiting embodiment, component identifier 112 may include text strings describing aircraft component information. Person of ordinary skill in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of highlighting terms and/or the various types of information and/or qualifications associated with an aircraft component that are relevant to generating first condition and the like thereof.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , computing device 104 may be configured to assign a component identifier 112 to an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108. Component identifier 112 may be assigned to an aircraft component when it is created. Component identifier 112 may include a serial number. Component identifier 112 may accompany a request for creation or refurbishing of the aircraft component. Component identifier 112 may be generated when the aircraft component is created. Additionally, in some embodiments, component identifier 112 may be generated when an aircraft component is refurbished, sold, transferred, conveyed, deployed, or the like. Assigning component identifier 112 may include a user inputting which aircraft component it is related to during creation, or a random barcode or serial number may be generated and assigned at creation.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , computing device 104 may be communicatively connected to a database containing aircraft component data. Aircraft component data may be stored on this database and may be collected from it as well. Database may be implemented, without limitation, as a relational database, a key-value retrieval database such as a NOSQL database, or any other format or structure for use as a database that a person skilled in the art would recognize as suitable upon review of the entirety of this disclosure. Database may alternatively or additionally be implemented using a distributed data storage protocol and/or data structure, such as a distributed hash table or the like. Database may include a plurality of data entries and/or records as described above. Data entries in a database may be flagged with or linked to one or more additional elements of information, which may be reflected in data entry cells and/or in linked tables such as tables related by one or more indices in a relational database. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which data entries in a database may store, retrieve, organize, and/or reflect data and/or records as used herein, as well as categories and/or populations of data consistently with this disclosure. In some embodiments, network data, or other information such as user information, transfer party information, and alimentary provider information, may be stored in and/or retrieved from database.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , each component of the plurality of aircraft components 108 may be included in an aircraft of a plurality of aircrafts. Aircraft may include an electrically powered aircraft (i.e., electric aircraft). In some embodiments, electrically powered aircraft may be an electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft. Electric aircraft may be capable of rotor-based cruising flight, rotor-based takeoff, rotor-based landing, fixed-wing cruising flight, airplane-style takeoff, airplane-style landing, and/or any combination thereof “Rotor-based flight,” as described in this disclosure, is where the aircraft generated lift and propulsion by way of one or more powered rotors coupled with an engine, such as a quadcopter, multi-rotor helicopter, or other vehicle that maintains its lift primarily using downward thrusting propulsors. “Fixed-wing flight,” as described in this disclosure, is where the aircraft is capable of flight using wings and/or foils that generate lift caused by the aircraft's forward airspeed and the shape of the wings and/or foils, such as airplane-style flight. Aircraft is further described below. Computing device 104 may be further configured to identify each aircraft of the plurality of aircrafts.

Identifying an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 may consist of retrieving aircraft component data from a user input device. A “user input device” may be any display where the user may communicate an input through it. As an example, and without limitation, user input device may be displayed on any electronic device, as described herein, such as, without limitation, a computer, tablet, remote device, and/or any other visual display device. Display may be configured to present, to a user, information related to the aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108. Display may include a graphical user interface, multi-function display (MFD), primary display, gauges, graphs, audio cues, visual cues, information on a heads-up display (HUD) or a combination thereof. Aircraft component data may also come from a database. Aircraft component data may be stored on this database and may be collected from it as well. Database may be implemented, without limitation, as a relational database, a key-value retrieval database such as a NOSQL database, or any other format or structure for use as a database that a person skilled in the art would recognize as suitable upon review of the entirety of this disclosure. Database may alternatively or additionally be implemented using a distributed data storage protocol and/or data structure, such as a distributed hash table or the like. Database may include a plurality of data entries and/or records as described above. Data entries in a database may be flagged with or linked to one or more additional elements of information, which may be reflected in data entry cells and/or in linked tables such as tables related by one or more indices in a relational database. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which data entries in a database may store, retrieve, organize, and/or reflect data and/or records as used herein, as well as categories and/or populations of data consistently with this disclosure. In some embodiments, network data, or other information such as user information, transfer party information, and alimentary provider information, may be stored in and/or retrieved from database.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , each component of the plurality of aircraft components may be included in an aircraft of a plurality of aircrafts. Aircraft may include an electrically powered aircraft (i.e., electric aircraft). In some embodiments, electrically powered aircraft may be an electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft. Electric aircraft may be capable of rotor-based cruising flight, rotor-based takeoff, rotor-based landing, fixed-wing cruising flight, airplane-style takeoff, airplane-style landing, and/or any combination thereof. “Rotor-based flight,” as described in this disclosure, is where the aircraft generated lift and propulsion by way of one or more powered rotors coupled with an engine, such as a quadcopter, multi-rotor helicopter, or other vehicle that maintains its lift primarily using downward thrusting propulsors. “Fixed-wing flight,” as described in this disclosure, is where the aircraft is capable of flight using wings and/or foils that generate lift caused by the aircraft's forward airspeed and the shape of the wings and/or foils, such as airplane-style flight. Aircraft is further described below. Computing device 104 may be further configured to identify each aircraft of the plurality of aircrafts.

Now referring to FIG. 2 , a diagram representing an exemplary embodiment of an aircraft 200 composed of a plurality of aircraft components is illustrated. Aircraft 200 may include a fuselage 204. As used in this disclosure a “fuselage” is the main body of an aircraft, or in other words, the entirety of the aircraft except for the cockpit, nose, wings, empennage, nacelles, any and all control surfaces, and generally contains an aircraft's payload. Fuselage 204 may comprise structural elements that physically support the shape and structure of an aircraft. Structural elements may take a plurality of forms, alone or in combination with other types. Structural elements may vary depending on the construction type of aircraft and specifically, the fuselage. Fuselage 204 may comprise a truss structure. A truss structure may be used with a lightweight aircraft and may include welded aluminum tube trusses. A truss, as used herein, is an assembly of beams that create a rigid structure, often in combinations of triangles to create three-dimensional shapes. A truss structure may alternatively comprise titanium construction in place of aluminum tubes, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, structural elements may comprise aluminum tubes and/or titanium beams. In an embodiment, and without limitation, structural elements may include an aircraft skin. Aircraft skin may be layered over the body shape constructed by trusses. Aircraft skin may comprise a plurality of materials such as aluminum, fiberglass, and/or carbon fiber, the latter of which will be addressed in greater detail later in this paper.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , aircraft 200 may include actuator 208. Actuator 208 may include any motor and/or propulsor described in this disclosure. In an embodiment, actuator 208 may be mechanically coupled to an aircraft. As used herein, a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand “mechanically coupled” to mean that at least a portion of a device, component, or circuit is connected to at least a portion of the aircraft via a mechanical coupling. Said mechanical coupling can include, for example, rigid coupling, such as beam coupling, bellows coupling, bushed pin coupling, constant velocity, split-muff coupling, diaphragm coupling, disc coupling, donut coupling, elastic coupling, flexible coupling, fluid coupling, gear coupling, grid coupling, Hirth joints, hydrodynamic coupling, jaw coupling, magnetic coupling, Oldham coupling, sleeve coupling, tapered shaft lock, twin spring coupling, rag joint coupling, universal joints, or any combination thereof. As used in this disclosure an “aircraft” is vehicle that may fly. As a non-limiting example, aircraft may include airplanes, helicopters, airships, blimps, gliders, paramotors, and the like thereof. In an embodiment, mechanical coupling may be used to connect the ends of adjacent parts and/or objects of an electric aircraft. Further, in an embodiment, mechanical coupling may be used to join two pieces of rotating electric aircraft components.

With continued reference to FIG. 2 , actuator 208 may be configured to produce a torque. As used in this disclosure a “torque” is a measure of force that causes an object to rotate about an axis in a direction. For example, and without limitation, torque may rotate an aileron and/or rudder to generate a force that may adjust and/or affect altitude, airspeed velocity, groundspeed velocity, direction during flight, and/or thrust. For example, actuator 208 may include a component used to produce a torque that affects aircrafts' roll and pitch, such as without limitation one or more ailerons. An “aileron,” as used in this disclosure, is a hinged surface which form part of the trailing edge of a wing in a fixed wing aircraft, and which may be moved via mechanical means such as without limitation servomotors, mechanical linkages, or the like. As a further example, actuator 208 may include a rudder, which may include, without limitation, a segmented rudder that produces a torque about a vertical axis. Additionally or alternatively, actuator 208 may include other flight control surfaces such as propulsors, rotating flight controls, or any other structural features which can adjust movement of aircraft 200. Actuator 208 may include one or more rotors, turbines, ducted fans, paddle wheels, and/or other components configured to propel a vehicle through a fluid medium including, but not limited to air.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , actuator 208 may include at least a propulsor component. As used in this disclosure a “propulsor component” or “propulsor” is a component and/or device used to propel a craft by exerting force on a fluid medium, which may include a gaseous medium such as air or a liquid medium such as water. In an embodiment, when a propulsor twists and pulls air behind it, it may, at the same time, push an aircraft forward with an amount of force and/or thrust. More air pulled behind an aircraft results in greater thrust with which the aircraft is pushed forward. Propulsor component may include any device or component that consumes electrical power on demand to propel an electric aircraft in a direction or other vehicle while on ground or in-flight. In an embodiment, propulsor component may include a puller component. As used in this disclosure a “puller component” is a component that pulls and/or tows an aircraft through a medium. As a non-limiting example, puller component may include a flight component such as a puller propeller, a puller motor, a puller propulsor, and the like. Additionally, or alternatively, puller component may include a plurality of puller flight components. In another embodiment, propulsor component may include a pusher component. As used in this disclosure a “pusher component” is a component that pushes and/or thrusts an aircraft through a medium. As a non-limiting example, pusher component may include a pusher component such as a pusher propeller, a pusher motor, a pusher propulsor, and the like. Additionally, or alternatively, pusher flight component may include a plurality of pusher flight components.

In another embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 2 , propulsor may include a propeller, a blade, or any combination of the two. A propeller may function to convert rotary motion from an engine or other power source into a swirling slipstream which may push the propeller forwards or backwards. Propulsor may include a rotating power-driven hub, to which several radial airfoil-section blades may be attached, such that an entire whole assembly rotates about a longitudinal axis. As a non-limiting example, blade pitch of propellers may be fixed at a fixed angle, manually variable to a few set positions, automatically variable (e.g. a “constant-speed” type), and/or any combination thereof as described further in this disclosure. As used in this disclosure a “fixed angle” is an angle that is secured and/or substantially unmovable from an attachment point. For example, and without limitation, a fixed angle may be an angle of 2.2° inward and/or 1.7° forward. As a further non-limiting example, a fixed angle may be an angle of 3.6° outward and/or 2.7° backward. In an embodiment, propellers for an aircraft may be designed to be fixed to their hub at an angle similar to the thread on a screw makes an angle to the shaft; this angle may be referred to as a pitch or pitch angle which may determine a speed of forward movement as the blade rotates. Additionally or alternatively, propulsor component may be configured having a variable pitch angle. As used in this disclosure a “variable pitch angle” is an angle that may be moved and/or rotated. For example, and without limitation, propulsor component may be angled at a first angle of 3.3° inward, wherein propulsor component may be rotated and/or shifted to a second angle of 1.7° outward.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , propulsor may include a thrust element which may be integrated into the propulsor. Thrust element may include, without limitation, a device using moving or rotating foils, such as one or more rotors, an airscrew or propeller, a set of airscrews or propellers such as contra-rotating propellers, a moving or flapping wing, or the like. Further, a thrust element, for example, can include without limitation a marine propeller or screw, an impeller, a turbine, a pump-jet, a paddle or paddle-based device, or the like.

With continued reference to FIG. 2 , actuator 208 may include power sources, control links to one or more elements, fuses, and/or mechanical couplings used to drive and/or control any other flight component. Actuators 208 may include a motor that operates to move one or more flight control components and/or one or more control surfaces, to drive one or more propulsors, or the like. A motor may be driven by direct current (DC) electric power and may include, without limitation, brushless DC electric motors, switched reluctance motors, induction motors, or any combination thereof. Alternatively or additionally, a motor may be driven by an inverter. A motor may also include electronic speed controllers, inverters, or other components for regulating motor speed, rotation direction, and/or dynamic braking.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , actuator 208 may include an energy source. An energy source may include, for example, a generator, a photovoltaic device, a fuel cell such as a hydrogen fuel cell, direct methanol fuel cell, and/or solid oxide fuel cell, an electric energy storage device (e.g. a capacitor, an inductor, and/or a battery). An energy source may also include a battery cell, or a plurality of battery cells connected in series into a module and each module connected in series or in parallel with other modules. Configuration of an energy source containing connected modules may be designed to meet an energy or power requirement and may be designed to fit within a designated footprint in an electric aircraft in which system may be incorporated.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 2 , an energy source may be used to provide a steady supply of electrical power to a load over a flight by an electric aircraft 200. For example, energy source may be capable of providing sufficient power for “cruising” and other relatively low-energy phases of flight. An energy source may also be capable of providing electrical power for some higher-power phases of flight as well, particularly when the energy source is at a high SOC, as may be the case for instance during takeoff. In an embodiment, energy source may include an emergency power unit which may be capable of providing sufficient electrical power for auxiliary loads including without limitation, lighting, navigation, communications, de-icing, steering or other systems requiring power or energy. Further, energy source may be capable of providing sufficient power for controlled descent and landing protocols, including, without limitation, hovering descent or runway landing. As used herein the energy source may have high power density where electrical power an energy source can usefully produce per unit of volume and/or mass is relatively high. As used in this disclosure, “electrical power” is a rate of electrical energy per unit time. An energy source may include a device for which power that may be produced per unit of volume and/or mass has been optimized, for instance at an expense of maximal total specific energy density or power capacity. Non-limiting examples of items that may be used as at least an energy source include batteries used for starting applications including Li ion batteries which may include NCA, NMC, Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) and Lithium Manganese Oxide (LMO) batteries, which may be mixed with another cathode chemistry to provide more specific power if the application requires Li metal batteries, which have a lithium metal anode that provides high power on demand, Li ion batteries that have a silicon or titanite anode, energy source may be used, in an embodiment, to provide electrical power to an electric aircraft or drone, such as an electric aircraft vehicle, during moments requiring high rates of power output, including without limitation takeoff, landing, thermal de-icing and situations requiring greater power output for reasons of stability, such as high turbulence situations, as described in further detail below. A battery may include, without limitation a battery using nickel based chemistries such as nickel cadmium or nickel metal hydride, a battery using lithium ion battery chemistries such as a nickel cobalt aluminum (NCA), nickel manganese cobalt (NMC), lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4), lithium cobalt oxide (LCO), and/or lithium manganese oxide (LMO), a battery using lithium polymer technology, lead-based batteries such as without limitation lead acid batteries, metal-air batteries, or any other suitable battery. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various devices of components that may be used as an energy source.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , an energy source may include a plurality of energy sources, referred to herein as a module of energy sources. Module may include batteries connected in parallel or in series or a plurality of modules connected either in series or in parallel designed to satisfy both power and energy requirements. Connecting batteries in series may increase a potential of at least an energy source which may provide more power on demand. High potential batteries may require cell matching when high peak load is needed. As more cells are connected in strings, there may exist a possibility of one cell failing which may increase resistance in module and reduce overall power output as voltage of the module may decrease as a result of that failing cell. Connecting batteries in parallel may increase total current capacity by decreasing total resistance, and it also may increase overall amp-hour capacity. Overall energy and power outputs of at least an energy source may be based on individual battery cell performance or an extrapolation based on a measurement of at least an electrical parameter. In an embodiment where energy source includes a plurality of battery cells, overall power output capacity may be dependent on electrical parameters of each individual cell. If one cell experiences high self-discharge during demand, power drawn from at least an energy source may be decreased to avoid damage to a weakest cell. Energy source may further include, without limitation, wiring, conduit, housing, cooling system and battery management system. Persons skilled in the art will be aware, after reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, of many different components of an energy source. Exemplary energy sources are disclosed in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 16/948,157 and 16/048,140 both entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HIGH ENERGY DENSITY BATTERY MODULE” by S. Donovan et al., which are incorporated in their entirety herein by reference.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , according to some embodiments, an energy source may include an emergency power unit (EPU) (i.e., auxiliary power unit). As used in this disclosure an “emergency power unit” is an energy source as described herein that is configured to power an essential system for a critical function in an emergency, for instance without limitation when another energy source has failed, is depleted, or is otherwise unavailable. Exemplary non-limiting essential systems include navigation systems, such as MFD, GPS, VOR receiver or directional gyro, and other essential flight components, such as propulsors.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , another exemplary actuator may include landing gear. Landing gear may be used for take-off and/or landing/Landing gear may be used to contact ground while aircraft 200 is not in flight. Exemplary landing gear is disclosed in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/196,719 entitled “SYSTEM FOR ROLLING LANDING GEAR” by R. Griffin et al., which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , aircraft 200 may include a pilot control 212, including without limitation, a hover control, a thrust control, an inceptor stick, a cyclic, and/or a collective control. As used in this disclosure a “collective control” or “collective” is a mechanical control of an aircraft that allows a pilot to adjust and/or control the pitch angle of the actuator 208. For example and without limitation, collective control may alter and/or adjust the pitch angle of all of the main rotor blades collectively. For example, and without limitation pilot control 212 may include a yoke control. As used in this disclosure a “yoke control” is a mechanical control of an aircraft to control the pitch and/or roll. For example and without limitation, yoke control may alter and/or adjust the roll angle of aircraft 200 as a function of controlling and/or maneuvering ailerons. In an embodiment, pilot control 212 may include one or more foot-brakes, control sticks, pedals, throttle levels, and the like thereof. In another embodiment, and without limitation, pilot control 212 may be configured to control a principal axis of the aircraft. As used in this disclosure a “principal axis” is an axis in a body representing one three dimensional orientations. For example, and without limitation, principal axis or more yaw, pitch, and/or roll axis. Principal axis may include a yaw axis. As used in this disclosure a “yaw axis” is an axis that is directed towards the bottom of the aircraft, perpendicular to the wings. For example, and without limitation, a positive yawing motion may include adjusting and/or shifting the nose of aircraft 200 to the right. Principal axis may include a pitch axis. As used in this disclosure a “pitch axis” is an axis that is directed towards the right laterally extending wing of the aircraft. For example, and without limitation, a positive pitching motion may include adjusting and/or shifting the nose of aircraft 200 upwards. Principal axis may include a roll axis. As used in this disclosure a “roll axis” is an axis that is directed longitudinally towards the nose of the aircraft, parallel to the fuselage. For example, and without limitation, a positive rolling motion may include lifting the left and lowering the right wing concurrently.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , pilot control 212 may be configured to modify a variable pitch angle. For example, and without limitation, pilot control 212 may adjust one or more angles of attack of a propeller. As used in this disclosure an “angle of attack” is an angle between the chord of the propeller and the relative wind. For example, and without limitation angle of attack may include a propeller blade angled 3.2°. In an embodiment, pilot control 212 may modify the variable pitch angle from a first angle of 2.71° to a second angle of 3.82°. Additionally or alternatively, pilot control 212 may be configured to translate a pilot desired torque for flight component 208. For example, and without limitation, pilot control 212 may translate that a pilot's desired torque for a propeller be 160 lb. ft. of torque. As a further non-limiting example, pilot control 212 may introduce a pilot's desired torque for a propulsor to be 290 lb. ft. of torque. Additional disclosure related to pilot control 212 may be found in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 17/001,845 and 16/929,206 both of which are entitled “A HOVER AND THRUST CONTROL ASSEMBLY FOR DUAL-MODE AIRCRAFT” by C. Spiegel et al., which are incorporated in their entirety herein by reference.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , aircraft 200 may include a loading system. A loading system may include a system configured to load an aircraft of either cargo or personnel. For instance, some exemplary loading systems may include a swing nose, which is configured to swing the nose of aircraft 200 of the way thereby allowing direct access to a cargo bay located behind the nose. A notable exemplary swing nose aircraft is Boeing 747. Additional disclosure related to loading systems can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/137,594 entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LOADING AND SECURING PAYLOAD IN AN AIRCRAFT” by R. Griffin et al., entirety of which in incorporated herein by reference.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , aircraft 200 may include a sensor 216. Sensor 216 may include any sensor or noise monitoring circuit described in this disclosure, for instance in reference to FIGS. 1-12 . Sensor 216 may be configured to sense a characteristic of pilot control 212. Sensor may be a device, module, and/or subsystem, utilizing any hardware, software, and/or any combination thereof to sense a characteristic and/or changes thereof, in an instant environment, for instance without limitation a pilot control 212, which the sensor is proximal to or otherwise in a sensed communication with, and transmit information associated with the characteristic, for instance without limitation digitized data. Sensor 216 may be mechanically and/or communicatively coupled to aircraft 200, including, for instance, to at least a pilot control 212. Sensor 216 may be configured to sense a characteristic associated with at least a pilot control 212. An environmental sensor may include without limitation one or more sensors used to detect ambient temperature, barometric pressure, and/or air velocity, one or more motion sensors which may include without limitation gyroscopes, accelerometers, inertial measurement unit (IMU), and/or magnetic sensors, one or more humidity sensors, one or more oxygen sensors, or the like. Additionally or alternatively, sensor 216 may include at least a geospatial sensor. Sensor 216 may be located inside an aircraft; and/or be included in and/or attached to at least a portion of the aircraft. Sensor may include one or more proximity sensors, displacement sensors, vibration sensors, and the like thereof. Sensor may be used to monitor the status of aircraft 200 for both critical and non-critical functions. Sensor may be incorporated into vehicle or aircraft or be remote.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , in some embodiments, sensor 216 may be configured to sense a characteristic associated with any pilot control described in this disclosure. Non-limiting examples of a sensor 216 may include an inertial measurement unit (IMU), an accelerometer, a gyroscope, a proximity sensor, a pressure sensor, a light sensor, a pitot tube, an air speed sensor, a position sensor, a speed sensor, a switch, a thermometer, a strain gauge, an acoustic sensor, and an electrical sensor. In some cases, sensor 216 may sense a characteristic as an analog measurement, for instance, yielding a continuously variable electrical potential indicative of the sensed characteristic. In these cases, sensor 216 may additionally comprise an analog to digital converter (ADC) as well as any additionally circuitry, such as without limitation a Whetstone bridge, an amplifier, a filter, and the like. For instance, in some cases, sensor 216 may comprise a strain gage configured to determine loading of one or flight components, for instance landing gear. Strain gage may be included within a circuit comprising a Whetstone bridge, an amplified, and a bandpass filter to provide an analog strain measurement signal having a high signal to noise ratio, which characterizes strain on a landing gear member. An ADC may then digitize analog signal produces a digital signal that can then be transmitted other systems within aircraft 200, for instance without limitation a computing system, a pilot display, and a memory component. Alternatively or additionally, sensor 216 may sense a characteristic of a pilot control 212 digitally. For instance in some embodiments, sensor 216 may sense a characteristic through a digital means or digitize a sensed signal natively. In some cases, for example, sensor 216 may include a rotational encoder and be configured to sense a rotational position of a pilot control; in this case, the rotational encoder digitally may sense rotational “clicks” by any known method, such as without limitation magnetically, optically, and the like.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , electric aircraft 200 may include a flight controller 220. As used in this disclosure a “flight controller” is a computing device of a plurality of computing devices dedicated to data storage, security, distribution of traffic for load balancing, and flight instruction. Flight controller 220 may include and/or communicate with any computing device as described in this disclosure, including without limitation a microcontroller, microprocessor, digital signal processor (DSP) and/or system on a chip (SoC) as described in this disclosure. Further, flight controller 220 may include a single computing device operating independently, or may include two or more computing device operating in concert, in parallel, sequentially or the like; two or more computing devices may be included together in a single computing device or in two or more computing devices. In embodiments, flight controller 220 may be installed in an aircraft, may control the aircraft remotely, and/or may include an element installed in the aircraft and a remote element in communication therewith. Flight controller 220 is further described herein below with reference to FIGS. 3 and 9 .

Still referring to FIG. 2 , electric aircraft 200 may include at least a motor 224, which may be mounted on a structural feature of the aircraft. Design of motor 224 may enable it to be installed external to structural member (such as a boom, nacelle, or fuselage) for easy maintenance access and to minimize accessibility requirements for the structure; this may improve structural efficiency by requiring fewer large holes in the mounting area. In some embodiments, motor 224 may include two main holes in top and bottom of mounting area to access bearing cartridge. Further, a structural feature may include a component of electric aircraft 200. For example, and without limitation structural feature may be any portion of a vehicle incorporating motor 224, including any vehicle as described in this disclosure. As a further non-limiting example, a structural feature may include without limitation a wing, a spar, an outrigger, a fuselage, or any portion thereof, persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of many possible features that may function as at least a structural feature. At least a structural feature may be constructed of any suitable material or combination of materials, including without limitation metal such as aluminum, titanium, steel, or the like, polymer materials or composites, fiberglass, carbon fiber, wood, or any other suitable material. As a non-limiting example, at least a structural feature may be constructed from additively manufactured polymer material with a carbon fiber exterior; aluminum parts or other elements may be enclosed for structural strength, or for purposes of supporting, for instance, vibration, torque or shear stresses imposed by at least propulsor 208. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various materials, combinations of materials, and/or constructions techniques.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , electric aircraft 200 may include a vertical takeoff and landing aircraft (eVTOL). As used herein, a vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft is one that can hover, take off, and land vertically. An eVTOL, as used herein, is an electrically powered aircraft typically using an energy source, of a plurality of energy sources to power the aircraft. In order to optimize the power and energy necessary to propel the aircraft. eVTOL may be capable of rotor-based cruising flight, rotor-based takeoff, rotor-based landing, fixed-wing cruising flight, airplane-style takeoff, airplane-style landing, and/or any combination thereof. Rotor-based flight, as described herein, is where the aircraft generated lift and propulsion by way of one or more powered rotors coupled with an engine, such as a “quad copter,” multi-rotor helicopter, or other vehicle that maintains its lift primarily using downward thrusting propulsors. Fixed-wing flight, as described herein, is where the aircraft is capable of flight using wings and/or foils that generate life caused by the aircraft's forward airspeed and the shape of the wings and/or foils, such as airplane-style flight.

With continued reference to FIG. 2 , a number of aerodynamic forces may act upon the electric aircraft 200 during flight. Forces acting on electric aircraft 200 during flight may include, without limitation, thrust, the forward force produced by the rotating element of the electric aircraft 200 and acts parallel to the longitudinal axis. Another force acting upon electric aircraft 200 may be, without limitation, drag, which may be defined as a rearward retarding force which is caused by disruption of airflow by any protruding surface of the electric aircraft 200 such as, without limitation, the wing, rotor, and fuselage. Drag may oppose thrust and acts rearward parallel to the relative wind. A further force acting upon electric aircraft 200 may include, without limitation, weight, which may include a combined load of the electric aircraft 200 itself, crew, baggage, and/or fuel. Weight may pull electric aircraft 200 downward due to the force of gravity. An additional force acting on electric aircraft 200 may include, without limitation, lift, which may act to oppose the downward force of weight and may be produced by the dynamic effect of air acting on the airfoil and/or downward thrust from the propulsor 208 of the electric aircraft. Lift generated by the airfoil may depend on speed of airflow, density of air, total area of an airfoil and/or segment thereof, and/or an angle of attack between air and the airfoil. For example, and without limitation, electric aircraft 200 are designed to be as lightweight as possible. Reducing the weight of the aircraft and designing to reduce the number of components is essential to optimize the weight. To save energy, it may be useful to reduce weight of components of electric aircraft 200, including without limitation propulsors and/or propulsion assemblies. In an embodiment, motor 224 may eliminate need for many external structural features that otherwise might be needed to join one component to another component. Motor 224 may also increase energy efficiency by enabling a lower physical propulsor profile, reducing drag and/or wind resistance. This may also increase durability by lessening the extent to which drag and/or wind resistance add to forces acting on electric aircraft 200 and/or propulsors.

Referring now to FIG. 3 , an exemplary embodiment 300 of a flight controller 220 is illustrated. In an embodiment, flight controller 220 may include a signal transformation component 308. As used in this disclosure a “signal transformation component” is a component that transforms and/or converts a first signal to a second signal, wherein a signal may include one or more digital and/or analog signals. For example, and without limitation, signal transformation component 308 may be configured to perform one or more operations such as preprocessing, lexical analysis, parsing, semantic analysis, and the like thereof. In an embodiment, and without limitation, signal transformation component 308 may include one or more analog-to-digital convertors that transform a first signal of an analog signal to a second signal of a digital signal. For example, and without limitation, an analog-to-digital converter may convert an analog input signal to a 10-bit binary digital representation of that signal. In another embodiment, signal transformation component 308 may include transforming one or more low-level languages such as, but not limited to, machine languages and/or assembly languages. For example, and without limitation, signal transformation component 308 may include transforming a binary language signal to an assembly language signal. In an embodiment, and without limitation, signal transformation component 308 may include transforming one or more high-level languages and/or formal languages such as but not limited to alphabets, strings, and/or languages. For example, and without limitation, high-level languages may include one or more system languages, scripting languages, domain-specific languages, visual languages, esoteric languages, and the like thereof. As a further non-limiting example, high-level languages may include one or more algebraic formula languages, business data languages, string and list languages, object-oriented languages, and the like thereof.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , signal transformation component 308 may be configured to optimize an intermediate representation 312. As used in this disclosure an “intermediate representation” is a data structure and/or code that represents the input signal. Signal transformation component 308 may optimize intermediate representation as a function of a data-flow analysis, dependence analysis, alias analysis, pointer analysis, escape analysis, and the like thereof. In an embodiment, and without limitation, signal transformation component 308 may optimize intermediate representation 312 as a function of one or more inline expansions, dead code eliminations, constant propagation, loop transformations, and/or automatic parallelization functions. In another embodiment, signal transformation component 308 may optimize intermediate representation as a function of a machine dependent optimization such as a peephole optimization, wherein a peephole optimization may rewrite short sequences of code into more efficient sequences of code. Signal transformation component 308 may optimize intermediate representation to generate an output language, wherein an “output language,” as used herein, is the native machine language of flight controller 220. For example, and without limitation, native machine language may include one or more binary and/or numerical languages.

In an embodiment, and without limitation, signal transformation component 308 may include transform one or more inputs and outputs as a function of an error correction code. An error correction code, also known as error correcting code (ECC), is an encoding of a message or lot of data using redundant information, permitting recovery of corrupted data. An ECC may include a block code, in which information is encoded on fixed-size packets and/or blocks of data elements such as symbols of predetermined size, bits, or the like. Reed-Solomon coding, in which message symbols within a symbol set having q symbols are encoded as coefficients of a polynomial of degree less than or equal to a natural number k, over a finite field F with q elements; strings so encoded have a minimum hamming distance of k+1, and permit correction of (q−k−1)/2 erroneous symbols. Block code may alternatively or additionally be implemented using Golay coding, also known as binary Golay coding, Bose-Chaudhuri, Hocquenghuem (BCH) coding, multidimensional parity-check coding, and/or Hamming codes. An ECC may alternatively or additionally be based on a convolutional code.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 3 , flight controller 220 may include a reconfigurable hardware platform 316. A “reconfigurable hardware platform,” as used herein, is a component and/or unit of hardware that may be reprogrammed, such that, for instance, a data path between elements such as logic gates or other digital circuit elements may be modified to change an algorithm, state, logical sequence, or the like of the component and/or unit. This may be accomplished with such flexible high-speed computing fabrics as field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), which may include a grid of interconnected logic gates, connections between which may be severed and/or restored to program in modified logic. Reconfigurable hardware platform 316 may be reconfigured to enact any algorithm and/or algorithm selection process received from another computing device and/or created using machine-learning processes.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , reconfigurable hardware platform 316 may include a logic component 320. As used in this disclosure a “logic component” is a component that executes instructions on output language. For example, and without limitation, logic component may perform basic arithmetic, logic, controlling, input/output operations, and the like thereof. Logic component 320 may include any suitable processor, such as without limitation a component incorporating logical circuitry for performing arithmetic and logical operations, such as an arithmetic and logic unit (ALU), which may be regulated with a state machine and directed by operational inputs from memory and/or sensors; logic component 320 may be organized according to Von Neumann and/or Harvard architecture as a non-limiting example. Logic component 320 may include, incorporate, and/or be incorporated in, without limitation, a microcontroller, microprocessor, digital signal processor (DSP), Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), Complex Programmable Logic Device (CPLD), Graphical Processing Unit (GPU), general purpose GPU, Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), analog or mixed signal processor, Trusted Platform Module (TPM), a floating point unit (FPU), and/or system on a chip (SoC). In an embodiment, logic component 320 may include one or more integrated circuit microprocessors, which may contain one or more central processing units, central processors, and/or main processors, on a single metal-oxide-semiconductor chip. Logic component 320 may be configured to execute a sequence of stored instructions to be performed on the output language and/or intermediate representation 312. Logic component 320 may be configured to fetch and/or retrieve the instruction from a memory cache, wherein a “memory cache,” as used in this disclosure, is a stored instruction set on flight controller 220. Logic component 320 may be configured to decode the instruction retrieved from the memory cache to opcodes and/or operands. Logic component 320 may be configured to execute the instruction on intermediate representation 312 and/or output language. For example, and without limitation, logic component 320 may be configured to execute an addition operation on intermediate representation 312 and/or output language.

In an embodiment, and without limitation, logic component 320 may be configured to calculate a flight element 324. As used in this disclosure a “flight element” is an element of datum denoting a relative status of aircraft. For example, and without limitation, flight element 324 may denote one or more torques, thrusts, airspeed velocities, forces, altitudes, groundspeed velocities, directions during flight, directions facing, forces, orientations, and the like thereof. For example, and without limitation, flight element 324 may denote that aircraft is cruising at an altitude and/or with a sufficient magnitude of forward thrust. As a further non-limiting example, flight status may denote that is building thrust and/or groundspeed velocity in preparation for a takeoff. As a further non-limiting example, flight element 324 may denote that aircraft is following a flight path accurately and/or sufficiently.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , flight controller 220 may include a chipset component 328. As used in this disclosure a “chipset component” is a component that manages data flow. In an embodiment, and without limitation, chipset component 328 may include a northbridge data flow path, wherein the northbridge dataflow path may manage data flow from logic component 320 to a high-speed device and/or component, such as a RAM, graphics controller, and the like thereof. In another embodiment, and without limitation, chipset component 328 may include a southbridge data flow path, wherein the southbridge dataflow path may manage data flow from logic component 320 to lower-speed peripheral buses, such as a peripheral component interconnect (PCI), industry standard architecture (ICA), and the like thereof. In an embodiment, and without limitation, southbridge data flow path may include managing data flow between peripheral connections such as ethernet, USB, audio devices, and the like thereof. Additionally or alternatively, chipset component 328 may manage data flow between logic component 320, memory cache, and a flight component 322. As used in this disclosure a “flight component” is a portion of an aircraft that can be moved or adjusted to affect one or more flight elements. For example, flight component 322 may include a component used to affect the aircrafts' roll and pitch which may comprise one or more ailerons. As a further example, flight component 332 may include a rudder to control yaw of an aircraft. In an embodiment, chipset component 328 may be configured to communicate with a plurality of flight components as a function of flight element 324. For example, and without limitation, chipset component 328 may transmit to an aircraft rotor to reduce torque of a first lift propulsor and increase the forward thrust produced by a pusher component to perform a flight maneuver.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 3 , flight controller 220 may be configured generate an autonomous function. As used in this disclosure an “autonomous function” is a mode and/or function of flight controller 220 that controls aircraft automatically. For example, and without limitation, autonomous function may perform one or more aircraft maneuvers, take offs, landings, altitude adjustments, flight leveling adjustments, turns, climbs, and/or descents. As a further non-limiting example, autonomous function may adjust one or more airspeed velocities, thrusts, torques, and/or groundspeed velocities. As a further non-limiting example, autonomous function may perform one or more flight path corrections and/or flight path modifications as a function of flight element 324. In an embodiment, autonomous function may include one or more modes of autonomy such as, but not limited to, autonomous mode, semi-autonomous mode, and/or non-autonomous mode. As used in this disclosure “autonomous mode” is a mode that automatically adjusts and/or controls aircraft and/or the maneuvers of aircraft in its entirety. For example, autonomous mode may denote that flight controller 220 will adjust the aircraft. As used in this disclosure a “semi-autonomous mode” is a mode that automatically adjusts and/or controls a portion and/or section of aircraft. For example, and without limitation, semi-autonomous mode may denote that a pilot will control the propulsors, wherein flight controller 220 will control the ailerons and/or rudders. As used in this disclosure “non-autonomous mode” is a mode that denotes a pilot will control aircraft and/or maneuvers of aircraft in its entirety.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 3 , flight controller 220 may generate autonomous function as a function of an autonomous machine-learning model. As used in this disclosure an “autonomous machine-learning model” is a machine-learning model to produce an autonomous function output given flight element 324 and a pilot signal 336 as inputs; this is in contrast to a non-machine learning software program where the commands to be executed are determined in advance by a user and written in a programming language. As used in this disclosure a “pilot signal” is an element of datum representing one or more functions a pilot is controlling and/or adjusting. For example, pilot signal 336 may denote that a pilot is controlling and/or maneuvering ailerons, wherein the pilot is not in control of the rudders and/or propulsors. In an embodiment, pilot signal 336 may include an implicit signal and/or an explicit signal. For example, and without limitation, pilot signal 336 may include an explicit signal, wherein the pilot explicitly states there is a lack of control and/or desire for autonomous function. As a further non-limiting example, pilot signal 336 may include an explicit signal directing flight controller 220 to control and/or maintain a portion of aircraft, a portion of the flight plan, the entire aircraft, and/or the entire flight plan. As a further non-limiting example, pilot signal 336 may include an implicit signal, wherein flight controller 220 detects a lack of control such as by a malfunction, torque alteration, flight path deviation, and the like thereof. In an embodiment, and without limitation, pilot signal 336 may include one or more explicit signals to reduce torque, and/or one or more implicit signals that torque may be reduced due to reduction of airspeed velocity. In an embodiment, and without limitation, pilot signal 336 may include one or more local and/or global signals. For example, and without limitation, pilot signal 336 may include a local signal that is transmitted by a pilot and/or crew member. As a further non-limiting example, pilot signal 336 may include a global signal that is transmitted by air traffic control and/or one or more remote users that are in communication with the pilot of aircraft. In an embodiment, pilot signal 336 may be received as a function of a tri-state bus and/or multiplexor that denotes an explicit pilot signal should be transmitted prior to any implicit or global pilot signal.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , autonomous machine-learning model may include one or more autonomous machine-learning processes such as supervised, unsupervised, or reinforcement machine-learning processes that flight controller 220 and/or a remote device may or may not use in the generation of autonomous function. As used in this disclosure “remote device” is an external device to flight controller 220. Additionally or alternatively, autonomous machine-learning model may include one or more autonomous machine-learning processes that a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) may or may not use in the generation of autonomous function. Autonomous machine-learning process may include, without limitation machine learning processes such as simple linear regression, multiple linear regression, polynomial regression, support vector regression, ridge regression, lasso regression, elasticnet regression, decision tree regression, random forest regression, logistic regression, logistic classification, K-nearest neighbors, support vector machines, kernel support vector machines, naïve bayes, decision tree classification, random forest classification, K-means clustering, hierarchical clustering, dimensionality reduction, principal component analysis, linear discriminant analysis, kernel principal component analysis, Q-learning, State Action Reward State Action (SARSA), Deep-Q network, Markov decision processes, Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), or the like thereof.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 3 , autonomous machine learning model may be trained as a function of autonomous training data, wherein autonomous training data may correlate a flight element, pilot signal, and/or simulation data to an autonomous function. For example, and without limitation, a flight element of an airspeed velocity, a pilot signal of limited and/or no control of propulsors, and a simulation data of required airspeed velocity to reach the destination may result in an autonomous function that includes a semi-autonomous mode to increase thrust of the propulsors. Autonomous training data may be received as a function of user-entered valuations of flight elements, pilot signals, simulation data, and/or autonomous functions. Flight controller 220 may receive autonomous training data by receiving correlations of flight element, pilot signal, and/or simulation data to an autonomous function that were previously received and/or determined during a previous iteration of generation of autonomous function. Autonomous training data may be received by one or more remote devices and/or FPGAs that at least correlate a flight element, pilot signal, and/or simulation data to an autonomous function. Autonomous training data may be received in the form of one or more user-entered correlations of a flight element, pilot signal, and/or simulation data to an autonomous function.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , flight controller 220 may receive autonomous machine-learning model from a remote device and/or FPGA that utilizes one or more autonomous machine learning processes, wherein a remote device and an FPGA is described above in detail. For example, and without limitation, a remote device may include a computing device, external device, processor, FPGA, microprocessor, and the like thereof. Remote device and/or FPGA may perform the autonomous machine-learning process using autonomous training data to generate autonomous function and transmit the output to flight controller 220. Remote device and/or FPGA may transmit a signal, bit, datum, or parameter to flight controller 220 that at least relates to autonomous function. Additionally or alternatively, the remote device and/or FPGA may provide an updated machine-learning model. For example, and without limitation, an updated machine-learning model may be comprised of a firmware update, a software update, an autonomous machine-learning process correction, and the like thereof. As a non-limiting example a software update may incorporate a new simulation data that relates to a modified flight element. Additionally or alternatively, the updated machine learning model may be transmitted to the remote device and/or FPGA, wherein the remote device and/or FPGA may replace the autonomous machine-learning model with the updated machine-learning model and generate the autonomous function as a function of the flight element, pilot signal, and/or simulation data using the updated machine-learning model. The updated machine-learning model may be transmitted by the remote device and/or FPGA and received by flight controller 220 as a software update, firmware update, or corrected autonomous machine-learning model. For example, and without limitation autonomous machine learning model may utilize a neural net machine-learning process, wherein the updated machine-learning model may incorporate a gradient boosting machine-learning process.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , flight controller 220 may include, be included in, and/or communicate with a mobile device such as a mobile telephone or smartphone. Further, flight controller 220 may communicate with one or more additional devices as described below in further detail via a network interface device. The network interface device may be utilized for commutatively connecting a flight controller to one or more of a variety of networks, and one or more devices. Examples of a network interface device include, but are not limited to, a network interface card (e.g., a mobile network interface card, a LAN card), a modem, and any combination thereof. Examples of a network include, but are not limited to, a wide area network (e.g., the Internet, an enterprise network), a local area network (e.g., a network associated with an office, a building, a campus or other relatively small geographic space), a telephone network, a data network associated with a telephone/voice provider (e.g., a mobile communications provider data and/or voice network), a direct connection between two computing devices, and any combinations thereof. The network may include any network topology and can may employ a wired and/or a wireless mode of communication.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 3 , flight controller 220 may include, but is not limited to, for example, a cluster of flight controllers in a first location and a second flight controller or cluster of flight controllers in a second location. Flight controller 220 may include one or more flight controllers dedicated to data storage, security, distribution of traffic for load balancing, and the like. Flight controller 220 may be configured to distribute one or more computing tasks as described below across a plurality of flight controllers, which may operate in parallel, in series, redundantly, or in any other manner used for distribution of tasks or memory between computing devices. For example, and without limitation, flight controller 220 may implement a control algorithm to distribute and/or command the plurality of flight controllers. As used in this disclosure a “control algorithm” is a finite sequence of well-defined computer implementable instructions that may determine the flight component of the plurality of flight components to be adjusted. For example, and without limitation, control algorithm may include one or more algorithms that reduce and/or prevent aviation asymmetry. As a further non-limiting example, control algorithms may include one or more models generated as a function of a software including, but not limited to Simulink by MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts, USA. In an embodiment, and without limitation, control algorithm may be configured to generate an auto-code, wherein an “auto-code,” is used herein, is a code and/or algorithm that is generated as a function of the one or more models and/or software's. In another embodiment, control algorithm may be configured to produce a segmented control algorithm. As used in this disclosure a “segmented control algorithm” is control algorithm that has been separated and/or parsed into discrete sections. For example, and without limitation, segmented control algorithm may parse control algorithm into two or more segments, wherein each segment of control algorithm may be performed by one or more flight controllers operating on distinct flight components.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 3 , control algorithm may be configured to determine a segmentation boundary as a function of segmented control algorithm. As used in this disclosure a “segmentation boundary” is a limit and/or delineation associated with the segments of the segmented control algorithm. For example, and without limitation, segmentation boundary may denote that a segment in the control algorithm has a first starting section and/or a first ending section. As a further non-limiting example, segmentation boundary may include one or more boundaries associated with an ability of flight component 332. In an embodiment, control algorithm may be configured to create an optimized signal communication as a function of segmentation boundary. For example, and without limitation, optimized signal communication may include identifying the discrete timing required to transmit and/or receive the one or more segmentation boundaries. In an embodiment, and without limitation, creating optimized signal communication further includes separating a plurality of signal codes across the plurality of flight controllers. For example, and without limitation the plurality of flight controllers may include one or more formal networks, wherein formal networks transmit data along an authority chain and/or are limited to task-related communications. As a further non-limiting example, communication network may include informal networks, wherein informal networks transmit data in any direction. In an embodiment, and without limitation, the plurality of flight controllers may include a chain path, wherein a “chain path,” as used herein, is a linear communication path comprising a hierarchy that data may flow through. In an embodiment, and without limitation, the plurality of flight controllers may include an all-channel path, wherein an “all-channel path,” as used herein, is a communication path that is not restricted to a particular direction. For example, and without limitation, data may be transmitted upward, downward, laterally, and the like thereof. In an embodiment, and without limitation, the plurality of flight controllers may include one or more neural networks that assign a weighted value to a transmitted datum. For example, and without limitation, a weighted value may be assigned as a function of one or more signals denoting that a flight component is malfunctioning and/or in a failure state.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , the plurality of flight controllers may include a master bus controller. As used in this disclosure a “master bus controller” is one or more devices and/or components that are connected to a bus to initiate a direct memory access transaction, wherein a bus is one or more terminals in a bus architecture. Master bus controller may communicate using synchronous and/or asynchronous bus control protocols. In an embodiment, master bus controller may include flight controller 220. In another embodiment, master bus controller may include one or more universal asynchronous receiver-transmitters (UART). For example, and without limitation, master bus controller may include one or more bus architectures that allow a bus to initiate a direct memory access transaction from one or more buses in the bus architectures. As a further non-limiting example, master bus controller may include one or more peripheral devices and/or components to communicate with another peripheral device and/or component and/or the master bus controller. In an embodiment, master bus controller may be configured to perform bus arbitration. As used in this disclosure “bus arbitration” is method and/or scheme to prevent multiple buses from attempting to communicate with and/or connect to master bus controller. For example and without limitation, bus arbitration may include one or more schemes such as a small computer interface system, wherein a small computer interface system is a set of standards for physical connecting and transferring data between peripheral devices and master bus controller by defining commands, protocols, electrical, optical, and/or logical interfaces. In an embodiment, master bus controller may receive intermediate representation 312 and/or output language from logic component 320, wherein output language may include one or more analog-to-digital conversions, low bit rate transmissions, message encryptions, digital signals, binary signals, logic signals, analog signals, and the like thereof described above in detail.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , master bus controller may communicate with a slave bus. As used in this disclosure a “slave bus” is one or more peripheral devices and/or components that initiate a bus transfer. For example, and without limitation, slave bus may receive one or more controls and/or asymmetric communications from master bus controller, wherein slave bus transfers data stored to master bus controller. In an embodiment, and without limitation, slave bus may include one or more internal buses, such as but not limited to a/an internal data bus, memory bus, system bus, front-side bus, and the like thereof. In another embodiment, and without limitation, slave bus may include one or more external buses such as external flight controllers, external computers, remote devices, printers, aircraft computer systems, flight control systems, and the like thereof.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 3 , control algorithm may optimize signal communication as a function of determining one or more discrete timings. For example, and without limitation master bus controller may synchronize timing of the segmented control algorithm by injecting high priority timing signals on a bus of the master bus control. As used in this disclosure a “high priority timing signal” is information denoting that the information is important. For example, and without limitation, high priority timing signal may denote that a section of control algorithm is of high priority and should be analyzed and/or transmitted prior to any other sections being analyzed and/or transmitted. In an embodiment, high priority timing signal may include one or more priority packets. As used in this disclosure a “priority packet” is a formatted unit of data that is communicated between the plurality of flight controllers. For example, and without limitation, priority packet may denote that a section of control algorithm should be used and/or is of greater priority than other sections.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , flight controller 220 may also be implemented using a “shared nothing” architecture in which data is cached at the worker, in an embodiment, this may enable scalability of aircraft and/or computing device. Flight controller 220 may include a distributer flight controller. As used in this disclosure a “distributer flight controller” is a component that adjusts and/or controls a plurality of flight components as a function of a plurality of flight controllers. For example, distributer flight controller may include a flight controller that communicates with a plurality of additional flight controllers and/or clusters of flight controllers. In an embodiment, distributed flight control may include one or more neural networks. For example, neural network also known as an artificial neural network, is a network of “nodes,” or data structures having one or more inputs, one or more outputs, and a function determining outputs based on inputs. Such nodes may be organized in a network, such as without limitation a convolutional neural network, including an input layer of nodes, one or more intermediate layers, and an output layer of nodes. Connections between nodes may be created via the process of “training” the network, in which elements from a training dataset are applied to the input nodes, a suitable training algorithm (such as Levenberg-Marquardt, conjugate gradient, simulated annealing, or other algorithms) is then used to adjust the connections and weights between nodes in adjacent layers of the neural network to produce the desired values at the output nodes. This process is sometimes referred to as deep learning.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , a node may include, without limitation a plurality of inputs x; that may receive numerical values from inputs to a neural network containing the node and/or from other nodes. Node may perform a weighted sum of inputs using weights w, that are multiplied by respective inputs xi. Additionally or alternatively, a bias b may be added to the weighted sum of the inputs such that an offset is added to each unit in the neural network layer that is independent of the input to the layer. The weighted sum may then be input into a function p, which may generate one or more outputs y. Weight w, applied to an input x; may indicate whether the input is “excitatory,” indicating that it has strong influence on the one or more outputs y, for instance by the corresponding weight having a large numerical value, and/or a “inhibitory,” indicating it has a weak effect influence on the one more inputs y, for instance by the corresponding weight having a small numerical value. The values of weights w, may be determined by training a neural network using training data, which may be performed using any suitable process as described above. In an embodiment, and without limitation, a neural network may receive semantic units as inputs and output vectors representing such semantic units according to weights w, that are derived using machine-learning processes as described in this disclosure.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , flight controller 220 may include a sub-controller 340. As used in this disclosure a “sub-controller” is a controller and/or component that is part of a distributed controller as described above; for instance, flight controller 220 may be and/or include a distributed flight controller made up of one or more sub-controllers. For example, and without limitation, sub-controller 340 may include any controllers and/or components thereof that are similar to distributed flight controller and/or flight controller as described above. Sub-controller 340 may include any component of any flight controller as described above. Sub-controller 340 may be implemented in any manner suitable for implementation of a flight controller as described above. As a further non-limiting example, sub-controller 340 may include one or more processors, logic components and/or computing devices capable of receiving, processing, and/or transmitting data across the distributed flight controller as described above. As a further non-limiting example, sub-controller 340 may include a controller that receives a signal from a first flight controller and/or first distributed flight controller component and transmits the signal to a plurality of additional sub-controllers and/or flight components.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , flight controller may include a co-controller 344. As used in this disclosure a “co-controller” is a controller and/or component that joins flight controller 220 as components and/or nodes of a distributer flight controller as described above. For example, and without limitation, co-controller 344 may include one or more controllers and/or components that are similar to flight controller 220. As a further non-limiting example, co-controller 344 may include any controller and/or component that joins flight controller 220 to distributer flight controller. As a further non-limiting example, co-controller 344 may include one or more processors, logic components and/or computing devices capable of receiving, processing, and/or transmitting data to and/or from flight controller 220 to distributed flight control system. Co-controller 344 may include any component of any flight controller as described above. Co-controller 344 may be implemented in any manner suitable for implementation of a flight controller as described above.

In an embodiment, and with continued reference to FIG. 3 , flight controller 220 may be designed and/or configured to perform any method, method step, or sequence of method steps in any embodiment described in this disclosure, in any order and with any degree of repetition. For instance, flight controller 220 may be configured to perform a single step or sequence repeatedly until a desired or commanded outcome is achieved; repetition of a step or a sequence of steps may be performed iteratively and/or recursively using outputs of previous repetitions as inputs to subsequent repetitions, aggregating inputs and/or outputs of repetitions to produce an aggregate result, reduction or decrement of one or more variables such as global variables, and/or division of a larger processing task into a set of iteratively addressed smaller processing tasks. Flight controller may perform any step or sequence of steps as described in this disclosure in parallel, such as simultaneously and/or substantially simultaneously performing a step two or more times using two or more parallel threads, processor cores, or the like; division of tasks between parallel threads and/or processes may be performed according to any protocol suitable for division of tasks between iterations. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which steps, sequences of steps, processing tasks, and/or data may be subdivided, shared, or otherwise dealt with using iteration, recursion, and/or parallel processing.

Back to referring to FIG. 1 , computing device 104 may be communicatively connected to an immutable sequential listing 120. An “immutable sequential listing,” as used in this disclosure, is a data structure that places data entries in a fixed sequential arrangement, such as a temporal sequence of entries and/or blocks thereof, where the sequential arrangement, once established, cannot be altered or reordered. An immutable sequential listing 120 may be, include and/or implement an immutable ledger, where data entries that have been posted to the immutable sequential listing cannot be altered. At least an immutable sequential listing 120 includes an immutable sequential listing for each aircraft of the plurality of aircrafts. Immutable sequential listing 120 is further described below. Immutable sequential listing 120 is further described below. Computing device 104 is configured to verify plurality of aircraft components 108 as a function of the immutable sequential listing, which is further explained later herein.

Referring now to FIG. 4 , an exemplary embodiment of an immutable sequential listing 120 is illustrated. Data elements are listing in immutable sequential listing 120; data elements may include any form of data, including textual data, image data, encrypted data, cryptographically hashed data, and the like. Data elements may include, without limitation, one or more at least a digitally signed assertions. In one embodiment, a digitally signed assertion 404 is a collection of textual data signed using a secure proof as described in further detail below; secure proof may include, without limitation, a digital signature as described above. Collection of textual data may contain any textual data, including without limitation American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII), Unicode, or similar computer-encoded textual data, any alphanumeric data, punctuation, diacritical mark, or any character or other marking used in any writing system to convey information, in any form, including any plaintext or cyphertext data; in an embodiment, collection of textual data may be encrypted, or may be a hash of other data, such as a root or node of a Merkle tree or hash tree, or a hash of any other information desired to be recorded in some fashion using a digitally signed assertion 404. In an embodiment, collection of textual data states that the owner of a certain transferable item represented in a digitally signed assertion 404 register is transferring that item to the owner of an address. A digitally signed assertion 404 may be signed by a digital signature created using the private key associated with the owner's public key, as described above.

Still referring to FIG. 4 , a digitally signed assertion 404 may describe a transfer of virtual currency, such as crypto-currency as described below. The virtual currency may be a digital currency. Item of value may be a transfer of trust, for instance represented by a statement vouching for the identity or trustworthiness of the first entity. Item of value may be an interest in a fungible negotiable financial instrument representing ownership in a public or private corporation, a creditor relationship with a governmental body or a corporation, rights to ownership represented by an option, derivative financial instrument, commodity, debt-backed security such as a bond or debenture or other security as described in further detail below. A resource may be a physical machine e.g. a ride share vehicle or any other asset. A digitally signed assertion 404 may describe the transfer of a physical good; for instance, a digitally signed assertion 404 may describe the sale of a product. In some embodiments, a transfer nominally of one item may be used to represent a transfer of another item; for instance, a transfer of virtual currency may be interpreted as representing a transfer of an access right; conversely, where the item nominally transferred is something other than virtual currency, the transfer itself may still be treated as a transfer of virtual currency, having value that depends on many potential factors including the value of the item nominally transferred and the monetary value attendant to having the output of the transfer moved into a particular user's control. The item of value may be associated with a digitally signed assertion 404 by means of an exterior protocol, such as the COLORED COINS created according to protocols developed by The Colored Coins Foundation, the MASTERCOIN protocol developed by the Mastercoin Foundation, or the ETHEREUM platform offered by the Stiftung Ethereum Foundation of Baar, Switzerland, the Thunder protocol developed by Thunder Consensus, or any other protocol.

Still referring to FIG. 4 , in one embodiment, an address is a textual datum identifying the recipient of virtual currency or another item of value in a digitally signed assertion 404. In some embodiments, address is linked to a public key, the corresponding private key of which is owned by the recipient of a digitally signed assertion 404. For instance, address may be the public key. Address may be a representation, such as a hash, of the public key. Address may be linked to the public key in memory of a computing device, for instance via a “wallet shortener” protocol. Where address is linked to a public key, a transferee in a digitally signed assertion 404 may record a subsequent a digitally signed assertion 404 transferring some or all of the value transferred in the first a digitally signed assertion 404 to a new address in the same manner. A digitally signed assertion 404 may contain textual information that is not a transfer of some item of value in addition to, or as an alternative to, such a transfer. For instance, as described in further detail below, a digitally signed assertion 404 may indicate a confidence level associated with a distributed storage node as described in further detail below.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 4 immutable sequential listing 120 records a series of at least a posted content in a way that preserves the order in which the at least a posted content took place. Temporally sequential listing may be accessible at any of various security settings; for instance, and without limitation, temporally sequential listing may be readable and modifiable publicly, may be publicly readable but writable only by entities and/or devices having access privileges established by password protection, confidence level, or any device authentication procedure or facilities described herein, or may be readable and/or writable only by entities and/or devices having such access privileges. Access privileges may exist in more than one level, including, without limitation, a first access level or community of permitted entities and/or devices having ability to read, and a second access level or community of permitted entities and/or devices having ability to write; first and second community may be overlapping or non-overlapping. In an embodiment, posted content and/or immutable sequential listing 120 may be stored as one or more zero knowledge sets (ZKS), Private Information Retrieval (PIR) structure, or any other structure that allows checking of membership in a set by querying with specific properties. Such database may incorporate protective measures to ensure that malicious actors may not query the database repeatedly in an effort to narrow the members of a set to reveal uniquely identifying information of a given posted content.

Still referring to FIG. 4 , immutable sequential listing 120 may preserve the order in which the at least a posted content took place by listing them in chronological order; alternatively or additionally, immutable sequential listing 120 may organize digitally signed assertions 404 into sub-listings 408 such as “blocks” in a blockchain, which may be themselves collected in a temporally sequential order; digitally signed assertions 404 within a sub-listing 408 may or may not be temporally sequential. The ledger may preserve the order in which at least a posted content took place by listing them in sub-listings 408 and placing the sub-listings 408 in chronological order. The immutable sequential listing 120 may be a distributed, consensus-based ledger, such as those operated according to the protocols promulgated by Ripple Labs, Inc., of San Francisco, Calif., or the Stellar Development Foundation, of San Francisco, Calif, or of Thunder Consensus. In some embodiments, the ledger is a secured ledger; in one embodiment, a secured ledger is a ledger having safeguards against alteration by unauthorized parties. The ledger may be maintained by a proprietor, such as a system administrator on a server, that controls access to the ledger; for instance, the user account controls may allow contributors to the ledger to add at least a posted content to the ledger, but may not allow any users to alter at least a posted content that have been added to the ledger. In some embodiments, ledger is cryptographically secured; in one embodiment, a ledger is cryptographically secured where each link in the chain contains encrypted or hashed information that makes it practically infeasible to alter the ledger without betraying that alteration has taken place, for instance by requiring that an administrator or other party sign new additions to the chain with a digital signature. Immutable sequential listing 120 may be incorporated in, stored in, or incorporate, any suitable data structure, including without limitation any database, datastore, file structure, distributed hash table, directed acyclic graph or the like. In some embodiments, the timestamp of an entry is cryptographically secured and validated via trusted time, either directly on the chain or indirectly by utilizing a separate chain. In one embodiment the validity of timestamp is provided using a time stamping authority as described in the RFC 3161 standard for trusted timestamps, or in the ANSI ASC x9.95 standard. In another embodiment, the trusted time ordering is provided by a group of entities collectively acting as the time stamping authority with a requirement that a threshold number of the group of authorities sign the timestamp.

In some embodiments, and with continued reference to FIG. 4 , immutable sequential listing 120, once formed, may be inalterable by any party, no matter what access rights that party possesses. For instance, immutable sequential listing 120 may include a hash chain, in which data is added during a successive hashing process to ensure non-repudiation. Immutable sequential listing 120 may include a block chain. In one embodiment, a block chain is immutable sequential listing 120 that records one or more new at least a posted content in a data item known as a sub-listing 408 or “block.” An example of a block chain is the BITCOIN block chain used to record BITCOIN transactions and values. Sub-listings 408 may be created in a way that places the sub-listings 408 in chronological order and link each sub-listing 408 to a previous sub-listing 408 in the chronological order so that any computing device may traverse the sub-listings 408 in reverse chronological order to verify any at least a posted content listed in the block chain. Each new sub-listing 408 may be required to contain a cryptographic hash describing the previous sub-listing 408. In some embodiments, the block chain contains a single first sub-listing 408 sometimes known as a “genesis block.”

Still referring to FIG. 4 , the creation of a new sub-listing 408 may be computationally expensive; for instance, the creation of a new sub-listing 408 may be designed by a “proof of work” protocol accepted by all participants in forming the immutable sequential listing 120 to take a powerful set of computing devices a certain period of time to produce. Where one sub-listing 408 takes less time for a given set of computing devices to produce the sub-listing 408 protocol may adjust the algorithm to produce the next sub-listing 408 so that it will require more steps; where one sub-listing 408 takes more time for a given set of computing devices to produce the sub-listing 408 protocol may adjust the algorithm to produce the next sub-listing 408 so that it will require fewer steps. As an example, protocol may require a new sub-listing 408 to contain a cryptographic hash describing its contents; the cryptographic hash may be required to satisfy a mathematical condition, achieved by having the sub-listing 408 contain a number, called a nonce, whose value is determined after the fact by the discovery of the hash that satisfies the mathematical condition. Continuing the example, the protocol may be able to adjust the mathematical condition so that the discovery of the hash describing a sub-listing 408 and satisfying the mathematical condition requires more or less steps, depending on the outcome of the previous hashing attempt. Mathematical condition, as an example, might be that the hash contains a certain number of leading zeros and a hashing algorithm that requires more steps to find a hash containing a greater number of leading zeros, and fewer steps to find a hash containing a lesser number of leading zeros. In some embodiments, production of a new sub-listing 408 according to the protocol is known as “mining.” The creation of a new sub-listing 408 may be designed by a “proof of stake” protocol as will be apparent to those skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 4 , in some embodiments, protocol also creates an incentive to mine new sub-listings 408. The incentive may be financial; for instance, successfully mining a new sub-listing 408 may result in the person or entity that mines the sub-listing 408 receiving a predetermined amount of currency. The currency may be fiat currency. Currency may be cryptocurrency as defined below. In other embodiments, incentive may be redeemed for particular products or services; the incentive may be a gift certificate with a particular business, for instance. In some embodiments, incentive is sufficiently attractive to cause participants to compete for the incentive by trying to race each other to the creation of sub-listings 408 Each sub-listing 408 created in immutable sequential listing 120 may contain a record or at least a posted content describing one or more addresses that receive an incentive, such as virtual currency, as the result of successfully mining the sub-listing 408.

With continued reference to FIG. 4 , where two entities simultaneously create new sub-listings 408, immutable sequential listing 120 may develop a fork; protocol may determine which of the two alternate branches in the fork is the valid new portion of the immutable sequential listing 120 by evaluating, after a certain amount of time has passed, which branch is longer. “Length” may be measured according to the number of sub-listings 408 in the branch. Length may be measured according to the total computational cost of producing the branch. Protocol may treat only at least a posted content contained the valid branch as valid at least a posted content. When a branch is found invalid according to this protocol, at least a posted content registered in that branch may be recreated in a new sub-listing 408 in the valid branch; the protocol may reject “double spending” at least a posted content that transfer the same virtual currency that another at least a posted content in the valid branch has already transferred. As a result, in some embodiments the creation of fraudulent at least a posted content requires the creation of a longer immutable sequential listing 120 branch by the entity attempting the fraudulent at least a posted content than the branch being produced by the rest of the participants; as long as the entity creating the fraudulent at least a posted content is likely the only one with the incentive to create the branch containing the fraudulent at least a posted content, the computational cost of the creation of that branch may be practically infeasible, guaranteeing the validity of all at least a posted content in the immutable sequential listing 120.

Still referring to FIG. 4 , additional data linked to at least a posted content may be incorporated in sub-listings 408 in the immutable sequential listing 120; for instance, data may be incorporated in one or more fields recognized by block chain protocols that permit a person or computer forming a at least a posted content to insert additional data in the immutable sequential listing 120. In some embodiments, additional data is incorporated in an un-spendable at least a posted content field. For instance, the data may be incorporated in an OP_RETURN within the BITCOIN block chain. In other embodiments, additional data is incorporated in one signature of a multi-signature at least a posted content. In an embodiment, a multi-signature at least a posted content is at least a posted content to two or more addresses. In some embodiments, the two or more addresses are hashed together to form a single address, which is signed in the digital signature of the at least a posted content. In other embodiments, the two or more addresses are concatenated. In some embodiments, two or more addresses may be combined by a more complicated process, such as the creation of a Merkle tree or the like. In some embodiments, one or more addresses incorporated in the multi-signature at least a posted content are typical crypto-currency addresses, such as addresses linked to public keys as described above, while one or more additional addresses in the multi-signature at least a posted content contain additional data related to the at least a posted content; for instance, the additional data may indicate the purpose of the at least a posted content, aside from an exchange of virtual currency, such as the item for which the virtual currency was exchanged. In some embodiments, additional information may include network statistics for a given node of network, such as a distributed storage node, e.g. the latencies to nearest neighbors in a network graph, the identities or identifying information of neighboring nodes in the network graph, the trust level and/or mechanisms of trust (e.g. certificates of physical encryption keys, certificates of software encryption keys, (in non-limiting example certificates of software encryption may indicate the firmware version, manufacturer, hardware version and the like), certificates from a trusted third party, certificates from a decentralized anonymous authentication procedure, and other information quantifying the trusted status of the distributed storage node) of neighboring nodes in the network graph, IP addresses, GPS coordinates, and other information informing location of the node and/or neighboring nodes, geographically and/or within the network graph. In some embodiments, additional information may include history and/or statistics of neighboring nodes with which the node has interacted. In some embodiments, this additional information may be encoded directly, via a hash, hash tree or other encoding.

With continued reference to FIG. 4 , in some embodiments, virtual currency is traded as a crypto-currency. In one embodiment, a crypto-currency is a digital, currency such as Bitcoins, Peercoins, Namecoins, and Litecoins. Crypto-currency may be a clone of another crypto-currency. The crypto-currency may be an “alt-coin.” Crypto-currency may be decentralized, with no particular entity controlling it; the integrity of the crypto-currency may be maintained by adherence by its participants to established protocols for exchange and for production of new currency, which may be enforced by software implementing the crypto-currency. Crypto-currency may be centralized, with its protocols enforced or hosted by a particular entity. For instance, crypto-currency may be maintained in a centralized ledger, as in the case of the XRP currency of Ripple Labs, Inc., of San Francisco, Calif. In lieu of a centrally controlling authority, such as a national bank, to manage currency values, the number of units of a particular crypto-currency may be limited; the rate at which units of crypto-currency enter the market may be managed by a mutually agreed-upon process, such as creating new units of currency when mathematical puzzles are solved, the degree of difficulty of the puzzles being adjustable to control the rate at which new units enter the market. Mathematical puzzles may be the same as the algorithms used to make productions of sub-listings 408 in a block chain computationally challenging; the incentive for producing sub-listings 408 may include the grant of new crypto-currency to the miners. Quantities of crypto-currency may be exchanged using at least a posted content as described above.

Referring back to FIG. 1 , computing device 104 may further be configured to modify immutable sequential listing 120 in response to a historic event associated with aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108. As used in this disclosure, a “historical event” is an event of relevance to the aircraft or aircraft component that includes content associated with the aircraft component. An historical event may include an event that could cause damage to the aircraft component, such as battery pack losing power, rotation degradation, propulsor that is not generating enough torque to maintain the flight plan, a crash, a collision, or the like. Aircraft component data may further be mapped on immutable sequential listing 120. “Mapped” refers to the process of matching fields of data from one database to another, or in this case, from the processor to the immutable sequential listing 120. Mapped data related to aircraft component data may be matched to particular component identifier 112. Aircraft component data may be mapped to more than one component identifier 112. Furthermore, aircraft component data may further include classifying a plurality of mapped data to at least a component identifier 112. This would involve the use of a classifier, which is described further below.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 1 , computing device 104 is configured to verify aircraft component of the plurality of aircraft components 108 on an immutable sequential listing 120 as a function of the component identifier 112. As used in this disclosure, “verification” is a process of ensuring that which is being “verified” complies with certain constraints, for example without limitation system requirements, regulations, and the like. In some cases, verification may include comparing a product, such as without limitation comparing component identifier 112, against another identifier or data of a different component or one or more acceptance criteria. Ensuring that component identifier 112 and aircraft component data follows acceptance criteria may, in some cases, constitute verification. In some cases, verification may include ensuring that data is complete, for example that all required data types, are present, readable, uncorrupted, and/or otherwise useful for computing device 104. In some cases, some or all verification processes may be performed by computing device 104. In some cases, at least a machine-learning process, for example a machine-learning model, may be used to verify. In some embodiments, at least one of validation and/or verification includes without limitation one or more of supervisory validation, machine-learning processes, graph-based validation, geometry-based validation, and rules-based validation. Computing device 104 may use any machine-learning process described in this disclosure for this or any other function.

Furthermore, validating aircraft component may include verifying the blockchain and using it to validate a component status. Verifying a blockchain may include validating an entry as a function of a resource datum on that entry. Verifying may include using one or more private keys, or resource keys, to access or validate resource datum of a block. Verifying the blockchain and using it to validate a component status may occur while the aircraft is idle or charging.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 1 , verifying aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 includes using one or more private keys to validate a component identifier 112 of an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108. A “private key”, as mentioned above and herein, is a secret number used in cryptography, similar to a password. Private key is the specific piece of information the computing device needs to communicate with the immutable sequential listing that it is allowed to have access to the information needed, which in this case is the aircraft component data. Immutable sequential listing is composed of entries, wherein each entry may contain a block identification as a function of a cryptographic hash, which are explained above. Each cryptographic hash may be hashed or generated as a function of some private key. Private key may be component identifier 112, such as a serial number or any of the other examples explained herein.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , computing device 104 may verify aircraft component using immutable sequence entries 116. In this disclosure, an “entry” is a block on the blockchain holding information specific to that entry. For example, entry 116 contains a block identification. Each entry 116 may contain a block identification as a function of a cryptographic hash, which is explained above. Each cryptographic hash may be hashed or generated as a function of some private key. A “private key”, as mentioned above and herein, is a secret number used in cryptography, similar to a password. Additionally, each entry 116 may include its own data storage system. Each entry 116 of the plurality of blockchain entries may include a resource datum. In this disclosure, a “resource datum” is a piece of data representing information concerning an aircraft component, such as component identifier 112. Using component identifier 112, verifying the aircraft component may include matching it's component identifier 112 to the identifier in an immutable sequence entry 116.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , computing device 104 may further be configured to monitor blocks on the immutable sequential listing 120 and flag blocks on immutable sequential listing 120 containing fraudulent hash-chains. As used herein, “fraudulent hash-chains” are applications of cryptographic hash functions that contain deceptive or untrue details concerning an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108. Blocks may be flagged by a user through the computing device, or a user interface as described above. Data on blocks may be compared to aircraft component data on a database and may be flagged if any inconsistencies arrive. “Flagging” blocks on immutable sequential listing 120 means that the blocks are marked somehow to signal that the block contains fraudulent information. Entries of data may also include records of transactions, such as Bitcoin transactions. Additionally, entries of data may include files, such as JPEGs, documents, spreadsheets, videos, pictures, etc. Blocks of immutable sequential listing may be hashed and encoded into a Merkle tree. In an embodiment, each block includes the cryptographic hash of the prior block, linking the blocks and creating a chain. The top of the Merkle tree may include a Merkle root that may include a cryptographic accumulator. Immutable sequential listing 120 may include a cryptographic accumulator. A “cryptographic accumulator,” as used in this disclosure, is a data structure created by relating a commitment, which may be smaller amount of data that may be referred to as an “accumulator” and/or “root,” to a set of elements, such as lots of data and/or collection of data, together with short membership and/or non-membership proofs for any element in the set. In an embodiment, these proofs may be publicly verifiable against the commitment. An accumulator may be said to be “dynamic” if the commitment and membership proofs can be updated efficiently as elements are added or removed from the set, at unit cost independent of the number of accumulated elements; an accumulator for which this is not the case may be referred to as “static.” A membership proof may be referred to as a as a “witness” whereby an element existing in the larger amount of data can be shown to be included in the root, while an element not existing in the larger amount of data can be shown not to be included in the root, where “inclusion” indicates that the included element was a part of the process of generating the root, and therefore was included in the original larger data set.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , verifying the aircraft component of the plurality of aircraft components 108 may comprises receiving a component manufacturing record. As used herein in this disclosure, a “component manufacturing record” is all documents or information relating to the manufacture of that specific aircraft component. Information in component manufacturing record may include the lot number the component was made with, when and where it was manufactured, materials used, sub-components, information on supply chain of the component, or the like. Component manufacturing record may further include manufacturing materials, manufacturing processes, manufacturing time, details about the manufacturing facility, or the like. A “manufacturing facility” as used in this disclosure is any group of components and/or entities capable of producing materials, parts, and/or objects. Computing device 104 may then verify aircraft component as a function of the component manufacturing record by matching the record received to a record already stored on immutable sequential listing 120.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , verifying aircraft component on immutable sequential listing 120 further comprises receiving a component maintenance record. As used herein in this disclosure, a “component maintenance record” is all documents or information relating to the maintenance and upkeep of that specific aircraft component. Information in component maintenance record may include data about routine maintenance, repairs, replacement of parts, etc. Moreover, component maintenance record may also include information on how the component is preserved. Information may also include phenomenon relating to the health and status of the aircraft component. Computing device 104 may then verify aircraft component as a function of the component maintenance record by matching the record received to a record already stored on immutable sequential listing 120.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , verifying aircraft component on immutable sequential listing 120 further comprises receiving a component incident record. As used herein in this disclosure, a “component incident record” is all documents or information relating to incidents related to that specific aircraft component. Information in component incident record may include data concerning the component failing, getting damaged, being involved in a crash or other issue, etc. Component incident record may include a failure datum associated with the component. As used in this disclosure, “failure datum” is an element of data identifying and/or describing a failure event of the aircraft component. Failure datum may also be an element of data describing the failure of the downward directed propulsor that has occurred. As a non-limiting example, failure datum may be generated as a function of the determination that a propulsor, such as a rotor, is not generating torque, and/or that propulsor and/or rotor is generating less torque than expected and/or necessary to produce a level of thrust required to maintain airspeed and/or lift. As a further example, a degree of torque may be sensed, without limitation, utilizing load sensors deployed at and/or around a propulsor and/or by measuring back electromotive force (back EMF) generated by a motor driving the propulsor. Additionally or alternatively, failure datum may be generated as a function of the determination that one or more power sources is losing capacity to provide sufficient power to downward directed propulsor; this may be determined based on any suitable measure of an energy source capacity and/or output. For instance and without limitation, this may be detected by detection that one or more other downward directed propulsors are consuming less power is being provided to one or more components. Computing device 104 may then verify aircraft component as a function of the component incident record by matching the record received to a record already stored on immutable sequential listing 120.

Referring still to FIG. 1 , verifying aircraft component on immutable sequential listing 120 further comprises receiving an aircraft maintenance record. As used herein, “aircraft maintenance record” is all documents or information relating to the maintenance and upkeep of the aircraft that the aircraft component is a part of. Information in aircraft maintenance record may include data routine maintenance, repair, etc. of an aircraft the component is incorporated in, or a system in which it is incorporated. For example, if the component is part of a propulsive system, aircraft maintenance record will have data on repairs to other parts of that system. Computing device 104 may then verify aircraft component as a function of the aircraft maintenance record by matching the record received to a record already stored on immutable sequential listing 120.

Still continuing to refer to FIG. 1 verifying aircraft component on immutable sequential listing 120 further comprises receiving an aircraft incident record. As used herein in this disclosure, an “aircraft incident record” is all documents or information relating to incidents related to the aircraft that the aircraft component is associated with. Information in aircraft incident record may include data concerning the aircraft failing, getting damaged, being involved in a crash or other issue, etc. Aircraft incident report may include the component incident report of all aircraft components comprising the aircraft associated with aircraft incident record. Aircraft incident record may include a failure datum associated with the aircraft. As used in this disclosure, “failure datum” is an element of data identifying and/or describing a failure event of the aircraft. As a non-limiting example, failure datum may be generated as a function of the determination that the aircraft is running out of energy, has hit something, is overheating, etc. As a further example, aircraft incident record may include any incident record of any component comprising the aircraft. Additionally or alternatively, failure datum may be generated as a function of the determination that one or more power sources is losing capacity to provide sufficient power to the aircraft and its components. Aircraft incident record may include any of the information described above with reference to the component incident record. Computing device 104 may then generate the immutable sequence entry 116 as a function of the aircraft maintenance record. Referring still to FIG. 1 , generating the immutable sequence entry 116 further comprises receiving an update to the software module. As used herein, “updating” the software module means replacing it with a newer version of the same software module. Computing device 104 may then verify aircraft component as a function of the aircraft incident record by matching the record received to a record already stored on immutable sequential listing 120. Software module is further described herein with reference to FIG. 9 .

Referring still to FIG. 1 , computing device 104 is further configured to enter blockchain updates on immutable sequential listing 120. As used herein, “blockchain updates” includes any change to data on immutable sequential listing 120. Whenever a new block, or entry 116, is added to the blockchain, every computer on the network updates its blockchain to reflect the change. Blockchain update may occur every time aircraft component data or any data related to the aircraft changes. For example, without limitation, blockchain update may include a routine check up for an aircraft component, creation of a new component, maintenance work on the component or the entire aircraft, or the like. Moreover, a status check on startup of the aircraft could include checking any of that info that was verified, and/or doing any verification that was not complete.

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , verifying aircraft component of the plurality of aircraft components 108 may be include the use of a classifier. A “classifier,” as used in this disclosure is a machine-learning model, such as a mathematical model, neural net, or program generated by a machine learning algorithm known as a “classification algorithm,” as described in further detail below, that sorts inputs into categories or bins of data, outputting the categories or bins of data and/or labels associated therewith. Aircraft component classifier may be configured to output at least a datum that labels or otherwise identifies a set of data that are clustered together, found to be close under a distance metric as described below, or the like. Aircraft component training data for aircraft component classifier may be taken from aircraft component data, wherein aircraft component training data is further described herein with reference to FIG. 5 . For example, aircraft component data may be classifier inputs that get outputted to a plurality of aircraft components. Computing device 104 and/or another device may generate aircraft component classifier using a classification algorithm, defined as a processes whereby a computing device 104 derives a classifier from aircraft component training data. Classification may be performed using, without limitation, linear classifiers such as without limitation logistic regression and/or naïve Bayes classifiers, nearest neighbor classifiers such as k-nearest neighbors classifiers, support vector machines, least squares support vector machines, fisher's linear discriminant, quadratic classifiers, decision trees, boosted trees, random forest classifiers, learning vector quantization, and/or neural network-based classifiers. The plurality of aircraft component labels are outputted as a function of the aircraft component training data comprising aircraft component data and aircraft component classifier.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , computing device 104 may be configured to generate a classifier using a Naïve Bayes classification algorithm. Naïve Bayes classification algorithm generates classifiers by assigning class labels to problem instances, represented as vectors of element values. Class labels are drawn from a finite set. Naïve Bayes classification algorithm may include generating a family of algorithms that assume that the value of a particular element is independent of the value of any other element, given a class variable. Naïve Bayes classification algorithm may be based on Bayes Theorem expressed as P(A/B)=P(B/A)P(A)÷P(B), where P(A/B) is the probability of hypothesis A given data B also known as posterior probability; P(B/A) is the probability of data B given that the hypothesis A was true; P(A) is the probability of hypothesis A being true regardless of data also known as prior probability of A; and P(B) is the probability of the data regardless of the hypothesis. A naïve Bayes algorithm may be generated by first transforming training data into a frequency table. Computing device 104 may then calculate a likelihood table by calculating probabilities of different data entries and classification labels. Computing device 104 may utilize a naïve Bayes equation to calculate a posterior probability for each class. A class containing the highest posterior probability is the outcome of prediction. Naïve Bayes classification algorithm may include a gaussian model that follows a normal distribution. Naïve Bayes classification algorithm may include a multinomial model that is used for discrete counts. Naïve Bayes classification algorithm may include a Bernoulli model that may be utilized when vectors are binary.

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , computing device 104 may be configured to generate a classifier using a K-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm. A “K-nearest neighbors algorithm” as used in this disclosure, includes a classification method that utilizes feature similarity to analyze how closely out-of-sample-features resemble training data to classify input data to one or more clusters and/or categories of features as represented in training data; this may be performed by representing both training data and input data in vector forms, and using one or more measures of vector similarity to identify classifications within training data, and to determine a classification of input data. K-nearest neighbors algorithm may include specifying a K-value, or a number directing the classifier to select the k most similar entries training data to a given sample, determining the most common classifier of the entries in the database, and classifying the known sample; this may be performed recursively and/or iteratively to generate a classifier that may be used to classify input data as further samples. For instance, an initial set of samples may be performed to cover an initial heuristic and/or “first guess” at an output and/or relationship, which may be seeded, without limitation, using expert input received according to any process as described herein. As a non-limiting example, an initial heuristic may include a ranking of associations between inputs and elements of training data. Heuristic may include selecting some number of highest-ranking associations and/or training data elements.

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , generating k-nearest neighbors algorithm may generate a first vector output containing a data entry cluster, generating a second vector output containing an input data, and calculate the distance between the first vector output and the second vector output using any suitable norm such as cosine similarity, Euclidean distance measurement, or the like. Each vector output may be represented, without limitation, as an n-tuple of values, where n is at least two values. Each value of n-tuple of values may represent a measurement or other quantitative value associated with a given category of data, or attribute, examples of which are provided in further detail below; a vector may be represented, without limitation, in n-dimensional space using an axis per category of value represented in n-tuple of values, such that a vector has a geometric direction characterizing the relative quantities of attributes in the n-tuple as compared to each other. Two vectors may be considered equivalent where their directions, and/or the relative quantities of values within each vector as compared to each other, are the same; thus, as a non-limiting example, a vector represented as [5, 10, 15] may be treated as equivalent, for purposes of this disclosure, as a vector represented as [1, 2, 3]. Vectors may be more similar where their directions are more similar, and more different where their directions are more divergent; however, vector similarity may alternatively or additionally be determined using averages of similarities between like attributes, or any other measure of similarity suitable for any n-tuple of values, or aggregation of numerical similarity measures for the purposes of loss functions as described in further detail below. Any vectors as described herein may be scaled, such that each vector represents each attribute along an equivalent scale of values. Each vector may be “normalized,” or divided by a “length” attribute, such as a length attribute l as derived using a Pythagorean norm: l=√{square root over (Σ_(i=0) ^(n)a_(i) ²)}, where a; is attribute number i of the vector. Scaling and/or normalization may function to make vector comparison independent of absolute quantities of attributes, while preserving any dependency on similarity of attributes; this may, for instance, be advantageous where cases represented in training data are represented by different quantities of samples, which may result in proportionally equivalent vectors with divergent values.

Referring now to FIG. 5 , an exemplary embodiment of a machine-learning module 500 that may perform one or more machine-learning processes as described in this disclosure is illustrated. Machine-learning module may perform determinations, classification, and/or analysis steps, methods, processes, or the like as described in this disclosure using machine learning processes. A “machine learning process,” as used in this disclosure, is a process that automatedly uses training data 504 to generate an algorithm that will be performed by a computing device/module to produce outputs 508 given data provided as inputs 512; this is in contrast to a non-machine learning software program where the commands to be executed are determined in advance by a user and written in a programming language.

Still referring to FIG. 5 , “training data,” as used herein, is data containing correlations that a machine-learning process may use to model relationships between two or more categories of data elements. For instance, and without limitation, training data 504 may include a plurality of data entries, each entry representing a set of data elements that were recorded, received, and/or generated together; data elements may be correlated by shared existence in a given data entry, by proximity in a given data entry, or the like. Multiple data entries in training data 504 may evince one or more trends in correlations between categories of data elements; for instance, and without limitation, a higher value of a first data element belonging to a first category of data element may tend to correlate to a higher value of a second data element belonging to a second category of data element, indicating a possible proportional or other mathematical relationship linking values belonging to the two categories. Multiple categories of data elements may be related in training data 504 according to various correlations; correlations may indicate causative and/or predictive links between categories of data elements, which may be modeled as relationships such as mathematical relationships by machine-learning processes as described in further detail below. Training data 504 may be formatted and/or organized by categories of data elements, for instance by associating data elements with one or more descriptors corresponding to categories of data elements. As a non-limiting example, training data 504 may include data entered in standardized forms by persons or processes, such that entry of a given data element in a given field in a form may be mapped to one or more descriptors of categories. Elements in training data 504 may be linked to descriptors of categories by tags, tokens, or other data elements; for instance, and without limitation, training data 504 may be provided in fixed-length formats, formats linking positions of data to categories such as comma-separated value (CSV) formats and/or self-describing formats such as extensible markup language (XML), JavaScript Object Notation (JSON), or the like, enabling processes or devices to detect categories of data.

Alternatively or additionally, and continuing to refer to FIG. 5 , training data 504 may include one or more elements that are not categorized; that is, training data 504 may not be formatted or contain descriptors for some elements of data. Machine-learning algorithms and/or other processes may sort training data 504 according to one or more categorizations using, for instance, natural language processing algorithms, tokenization, detection of correlated values in raw data and the like; categories may be generated using correlation and/or other processing algorithms. As a non-limiting example, in a corpus of text, phrases making up a number “n” of compound words, such as nouns modified by other nouns, may be identified according to a statistically significant prevalence of n-grams containing such words in a particular order; such an n-gram may be categorized as an element of language such as a “word” to be tracked similarly to single words, generating a new category as a result of statistical analysis. Similarly, in a data entry including some textual data, a person's name may be identified by reference to a list, dictionary, or other compendium of terms, permitting ad-hoc categorization by machine-learning algorithms, and/or automated association of data in the data entry with descriptors or into a given format. The ability to categorize data entries automatedly may enable the same training data 504 to be made applicable for two or more distinct machine-learning algorithms as described in further detail below. Training data 504 used by machine-learning module 500 may correlate any input data as described in this disclosure to any output data as described in this disclosure.

Further referring to FIG. 5 , training data may be filtered, sorted, and/or selected using one or more supervised and/or unsupervised machine-learning processes and/or models as described in further detail below; such models may include without limitation a training data classifier 516. Training data classifier 516 may include a “classifier,” which as used in this disclosure is a machine-learning model as defined below, such as a mathematical model, neural net, or program generated by a machine learning algorithm known as a “classification algorithm,” as described in further detail below, that sorts inputs into categories or bins of data, outputting the categories or bins of data and/or labels associated therewith. A classifier may be configured to output at least a datum that labels or otherwise identifies a set of data that are clustered together, found to be close under a distance metric as described below, or the like. Machine-learning module 500 may generate a classifier using a classification algorithm, defined as a processes whereby a computing device and/or any module and/or component operating thereon derives a classifier from training data 504. Classification may be performed using, without limitation, linear classifiers such as without limitation logistic regression and/or naive Bayes classifiers, nearest neighbor classifiers such as k-nearest neighbors classifiers, support vector machines, least squares support vector machines, fisher's linear discriminant, quadratic classifiers, decision trees, boosted trees, random forest classifiers, learning vector quantization, and/or neural network-based classifiers.

Still referring to FIG. 5 , machine-learning module 500 may be configured to perform a lazy-learning process 520 and/or protocol, which may alternatively be referred to as a “lazy loading” or “call-when-needed” process and/or protocol, may be a process whereby machine learning is conducted upon receipt of an input to be converted to an output, by combining the input and training set to derive the algorithm to be used to produce the output on demand. For instance, an initial set of simulations may be performed to cover an initial heuristic and/or “first guess” at an output and/or relationship. As a non-limiting example, an initial heuristic may include a ranking of associations between inputs and elements of training data 504. Heuristic may include selecting some number of highest-ranking associations and/or training data 504 elements. Lazy learning may implement any suitable lazy learning algorithm, including without limitation a K-nearest neighbors algorithm, a lazy naïve Bayes algorithm, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various lazy-learning algorithms that may be applied to generate outputs as described in this disclosure, including without limitation lazy learning applications of machine-learning algorithms as described in further detail below.

Alternatively or additionally, and with continued reference to FIG. 5 , machine-learning processes as described in this disclosure may be used to generate machine-learning models 524. A “machine-learning model,” as used in this disclosure, is a mathematical and/or algorithmic representation of a relationship between inputs and outputs, as generated using any machine-learning process including without limitation any process as described above, and stored in memory; an input is submitted to a machine-learning model 524 once created, which generates an output based on the relationship that was derived. For instance, and without limitation, a linear regression model, generated using a linear regression algorithm, may compute a linear combination of input data using coefficients derived during machine-learning processes to calculate an output datum. As a further non-limiting example, a machine-learning model 524 may be generated by creating an artificial neural network, such as a convolutional neural network including an input layer of nodes, one or more intermediate layers, and an output layer of nodes. Connections between nodes may be created via the process of “training” the network, in which elements from a training data 504 set are applied to the input nodes, a suitable training algorithm (such as Levenberg-Marquardt, conjugate gradient, simulated annealing, or other algorithms) is then used to adjust the connections and weights between nodes in adjacent layers of the neural network to produce the desired values at the output nodes. This process is sometimes referred to as deep learning.

Still referring to FIG. 5 , machine-learning algorithms may include at least a supervised machine-learning process 528. At least a supervised machine-learning process 528, as defined herein, include algorithms that receive a training set relating a number of inputs to a number of outputs, and seek to find one or more mathematical relations relating inputs to outputs, where each of the one or more mathematical relations is optimal according to some criterion specified to the algorithm using some scoring function. For instance, a supervised learning algorithm may include inputs and outputs described through this disclosure, and a scoring function representing a desired form of relationship to be detected between inputs and outputs; scoring function may, for instance, seek to maximize the probability that a given input and/or combination of elements inputs is associated with a given output to minimize the probability that a given input is not associated with a given output. Scoring function may be expressed as a risk function representing an “expected loss” of an algorithm relating inputs to outputs, where loss is computed as an error function representing a degree to which a prediction generated by the relation is incorrect when compared to a given input-output pair provided in training data 504. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various possible variations of at least a supervised machine-learning process 528 that may be used to determine relation between inputs and outputs. Supervised machine-learning processes may include classification algorithms as defined above.

Further referring to FIG. 5 , machine learning processes may include at least an unsupervised machine-learning processes 532. An unsupervised machine-learning process, as used herein, is a process that derives inferences in datasets without regard to labels; as a result, an unsupervised machine-learning process may be free to discover any structure, relationship, and/or correlation provided in the data. Unsupervised processes may not require a response variable; unsupervised processes may be used to find interesting patterns and/or inferences between variables, to determine a degree of correlation between two or more variables, or the like.

Still referring to FIG. 5 , machine-learning module 500 may be designed and configured to create a machine-learning model 524 using techniques for development of linear regression models. Linear regression models may include ordinary least squares regression, which aims to minimize the square of the difference between predicted outcomes and actual outcomes according to an appropriate norm for measuring such a difference (e.g., a vector-space distance norm); coefficients of the resulting linear equation may be modified to improve minimization. Linear regression models may include ridge regression methods, where the function to be minimized includes the least-squares function plus term multiplying the square of each coefficient by a scalar amount to penalize large coefficients. Linear regression models may include least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models, in which ridge regression is combined with multiplying the least-squares term by a factor of 1 divided by double the number of samples. Linear regression models may include a multi-task lasso model wherein the norm applied in the least-squares term of the lasso model is the Frobenius norm amounting to the square root of the sum of squares of all terms. Linear regression models may include the elastic net model, a multi-task elastic net model, a least angle regression model, a LARS lasso model, an orthogonal matching pursuit model, a Bayesian regression model, a logistic regression model, a stochastic gradient descent model, a perceptron model, a passive aggressive algorithm, a robustness regression model, a Huber regression model, or any other suitable model that may occur to persons skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure. Linear regression models may be generalized in an embodiment to polynomial regression models, whereby a polynomial equation (e.g., a quadratic, cubic or higher-order equation) providing a best predicted output/actual output fit is sought; similar methods to those described above may be applied to minimize error functions, as will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 5 , machine-learning algorithms may include, without limitation, linear discriminant analysis. Machine-learning algorithm may include quadratic discriminate analysis. Machine-learning algorithms may include kernel ridge regression. Machine-learning algorithms may include support vector machines, including without limitation support vector classification-based regression processes. Machine-learning algorithms may include stochastic gradient descent algorithms, including classification and regression algorithms based on stochastic gradient descent. Machine-learning algorithms may include nearest neighbors algorithms. Machine-learning algorithms may include various forms of latent space regularization such as variational regularization. Machine-learning algorithms may include Gaussian processes such as Gaussian Process Regression. Machine-learning algorithms may include cross-decomposition algorithms, including partial least squares and/or canonical correlation analysis. Machine-learning algorithms may include naïve Bayes methods. Machine-learning algorithms may include algorithms based on decision trees, such as decision tree classification or regression algorithms. Machine-learning algorithms may include ensemble methods such as bagging meta-estimator, forest of randomized tress, AdaBoost, gradient tree boosting, and/or voting classifier methods. Machine-learning algorithms may include neural net algorithms, including convolutional neural net processes.

Referring now to FIG. 6 , an exemplary embodiment of neural network 600 is illustrated. A neural network 600 also known as an artificial neural network, is a network of “nodes,” or data structures having one or more inputs, one or more outputs, and a function determining outputs based on inputs. Such nodes may be organized in a network, such as without limitation a convolutional neural network, including an input layer of nodes 604, one or more intermediate layers 608, and an output layer of nodes 612. Connections between nodes may be created via the process of “training” the network, in which elements from a training dataset are applied to the input nodes, a suitable training algorithm (such as Levenberg-Marquardt, conjugate gradient, simulated annealing, or other algorithms) is then used to adjust the connections and weights between nodes in adjacent layers of the neural network to produce the desired values at the output nodes. This process is sometimes referred to as deep learning. Connections may run solely from input nodes toward output nodes in a “feed-forward” network or may feed outputs of one layer back to inputs of the same or a different layer in a “recurrent network.”

Referring now to FIG. 7 , an exemplary embodiment of a node of a neural network is illustrated. A node may include, without limitation a plurality of inputs x; that may receive numerical values from inputs to a neural network containing the node and/or from other nodes. Node may perform a weighted sum of inputs using weights w, that are multiplied by respective inputs xi. Additionally or alternatively, a bias b may be added to the weighted sum of the inputs such that an offset is added to each unit in the neural network layer that is independent of the input to the layer. The weighted sum may then be input into a function p, which may generate one or more outputs y. Weight w, applied to an input x; may indicate whether the input is “excitatory,” indicating that it has strong influence on the one or more outputs y, for instance by the corresponding weight having a large numerical value, and/or a “inhibitory,” indicating it has a weak effect influence on the one more inputs y, for instance by the corresponding weight having a small numerical value. The values of weights w, may be determined by training a neural network using training data, which may be performed using any suitable process as described above.

Referring now to FIG. 8 , a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a method 800 for verifying an aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing 120. Method 800 is performed by computing device 104. Computing device 104 may be any of the computing devices as described herein with reference to FIGS. 1, 3, and 9 . Verification may be any of the verifications as described herein with reference to FIGS. 1 and 4 . Aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 may be any of the components as described herein with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 . Immutable sequential listing 120 may be any of the immutable sequential listings as described herein with reference to FIGS. 1 and 4 .

Still referring to FIG. 8 , at step 805, method 800 includes identifying, at a computing device 104, an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108, wherein aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 is associated with aircraft component data. Aircraft component data may comprise a most recent state of the aircraft component. Aircraft component data may comprise component identifier 112. Component identifier 112 includes a serial number. Aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 may include software and/or firmware. Identifying an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 may include determining a component identifier 112 associated with aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108. Computing device 104 may be any of the computing devices as described herein with reference to FIGS. 1, 3, and 9 . Aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 may be any of the components as described herein with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 . Aircraft component data may be any of the component data as described herein with reference to FIGS. 1, 2 , and 3. Component identifier 112 may include any of the component identifiers as described herein with reference to FIG. 1 .

Still referring to FIG. 8 , at step 810, method 800 includes verifying, at a computing device 104, aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 as a function of an immutable sequential listing 120 and aircraft component data. Computing device 104 may also be configured to monitor blocks on the immutable sequential listing 120 and flag blocks on immutable sequential listing 120 containing fraudulent hash-chains. Computing device 104 may further modify immutable sequential listing 120 in response to a historic event associated with aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108. Verifying aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 further includes using a machine learning process to compare aircraft component data of the identified aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 to aircraft component data in the immutable sequential listing 120. Verifying aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 includes using one or more private keys to validate a component identifier 112 of an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108. Computing device 104 may be any of the computing devices as described herein with reference to FIGS. 1, 3, and 9 . Aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components 108 may be any of the components as described herein with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 . Aircraft component data may be any of the component data as described herein with reference to FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 . Immutable sequential listing 120 may be any of the immutable sequential listings as described herein with reference to FIGS. 1 and 4 .

It is to be noted that any one or more of the aspects and embodiments described herein may be conveniently implemented using one or more machines (e.g., one or more computing devices that are utilized as a user computing device for an electronic document, one or more server devices, such as a document server, etc.) programmed according to the teachings of the present specification, as will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the computer art. Appropriate software coding can readily be prepared by skilled programmers based on the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the software art. Aspects and implementations discussed above employing software and/or software modules may also include appropriate hardware for assisting in the implementation of the machine executable instructions of the software and/or software module.

Such software may be a computer program product that employs a machine-readable storage medium. A machine-readable storage medium may be any medium that is capable of storing and/or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by a machine (e.g., a computing device) and that causes the machine to perform any one of the methodologies and/or embodiments described herein. Examples of a machine-readable storage medium include, but are not limited to, a magnetic disk, an optical disc (e.g., CD, CD-R, DVD, DVD-R, etc.), a magneto-optical disk, a read-only memory “ROM” device, a random access memory “RAM” device, a magnetic card, an optical card, a solid-state memory device, an EPROM, an EEPROM, and any combinations thereof. A machine-readable medium, as used herein, is intended to include a single medium as well as a collection of physically separate media, such as, for example, a collection of compact discs or one or more hard disk drives in combination with a computer memory. As used herein, a machine-readable storage medium does not include transitory forms of signal transmission.

Such software may also include information (e.g., data) carried as a data signal on a data carrier, such as a carrier wave. For example, machine-executable information may be included as a data-carrying signal embodied in a data carrier in which the signal encodes a sequence of instruction, or portion thereof, for execution by a machine (e.g., a computing device) and any related information (e.g., data structures and data) that causes the machine to perform any one of the methodologies and/or embodiments described herein.

Examples of a computing device include, but are not limited to, an electronic book reading device, a computer workstation, a terminal computer, a server computer, a handheld device (e.g., a tablet computer, a smartphone, etc.), a web appliance, a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, any machine capable of executing a sequence of instructions that specify an action to be taken by that machine, and any combinations thereof. In one example, a computing device may include and/or be included in a kiosk.

FIG. 9 shows a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of a computing device in the exemplary form of a computer system 900 within which a set of instructions for causing a control system to perform any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure may be executed. It is also contemplated that multiple computing devices may be utilized to implement a specially configured set of instructions for causing one or more of the devices to perform any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure. Computer system 900 includes a processor 904 and a memory 908 that communicate with each other, and with other components, via a bus 912. Bus 912 may include any of several types of bus structures including, but not limited to, a memory bus, a memory controller, a peripheral bus, a local bus, and any combinations thereof, using any of a variety of bus architectures.

Processor 904 may include any suitable processor, such as without limitation a processor incorporating logical circuitry for performing arithmetic and logical operations, such as an arithmetic and logic unit (ALU), which may be regulated with a state machine and directed by operational inputs from memory and/or sensors; processor 904 may be organized according to Von Neumann and/or Harvard architecture as a non-limiting example. Processor 904 may include, incorporate, and/or be incorporated in, without limitation, a microcontroller, microprocessor, digital signal processor (DSP), Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), Complex Programmable Logic Device (CPLD), Graphical Processing Unit (GPU), general purpose GPU, Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), analog or mixed signal processor, Trusted Platform Module (TPM), a floating point unit (FPU), and/or system on a chip (SoC).

Memory 908 may include various components (e.g., machine-readable media) including, but not limited to, a random-access memory component, a read only component, and any combinations thereof. In one example, a basic input/output system 916 (BIOS), including basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer system 900, such as during start-up, may be stored in memory 908. Memory 908 may also include (e.g., stored on one or more machine-readable media) instructions (e.g., software) 920 embodying any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure. In another example, memory 908 may further include any number of program modules including, but not limited to, an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, program data, and any combinations thereof.

Computer system 900 may also include a storage device 924. Examples of a storage device (e.g., storage device 924) include, but are not limited to, a hard disk drive, a magnetic disk drive, an optical disc drive in combination with an optical medium, a solid-state memory device, and any combinations thereof. Storage device 924 may be connected to bus 912 by an appropriate interface (not shown). Example interfaces include, but are not limited to, SCSI, advanced technology attachment (ATA), serial ATA, universal serial bus (USB), IEEE 1394 (FIREWIRE), and any combinations thereof. In one example, storage device 924 (or one or more components thereof) may be removably interfaced with computer system 900 (e.g., via an external port connector (not shown)). Particularly, storage device 924 and an associated machine-readable medium 928 may provide nonvolatile and/or volatile storage of machine-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, and/or other data for computer system 900. In one example, software 920 may reside, completely or partially, within machine-readable medium 928. In another example, software 920 may reside, completely or partially, within processor 904.

Computer system 900 may also include an input device 932. In one example, a user of computer system 900 may enter commands and/or other information into computer system 900 via input device 932. Examples of an input device 932 include, but are not limited to, an alpha-numeric input device (e.g., a keyboard), a pointing device, a joystick, a gamepad, an audio input device (e.g., a microphone, a voice response system, etc.), a cursor control device (e.g., a mouse), a touchpad, an optical scanner, a video capture device (e.g., a still camera, a video camera), a touchscreen, and any combinations thereof. Input device 932 may be interfaced to bus 912 via any of a variety of interfaces (not shown) including, but not limited to, a serial interface, a parallel interface, a game port, a USB interface, a FIREWIRE interface, a direct interface to bus 912, and any combinations thereof. Input device 932 may include a touch screen interface that may be a part of or separate from display 936, discussed further below. Input device 932 may be utilized as a user selection device for selecting one or more graphical representations in a graphical interface as described above.

A user may also input commands and/or other information to computer system 900 via storage device 924 (e.g., a removable disk drive, a flash drive, etc.) and/or network interface device 940. A network interface device, such as network interface device 940, may be utilized for connecting computer system 900 to one or more of a variety of networks, such as network 944, and one or more remote devices 948 connected thereto. Examples of a network interface device include, but are not limited to, a network interface card (e.g., a mobile network interface card, a LAN card), a modem, and any combination thereof. Examples of a network include, but are not limited to, a wide area network (e.g., the Internet, an enterprise network), a local area network (e.g., a network associated with an office, a building, a campus or other relatively small geographic space), a telephone network, a data network associated with a telephone/voice provider (e.g., a mobile communications provider data and/or voice network), a direct connection between two computing devices, and any combinations thereof. A network, such as network 944, may employ a wired and/or a wireless mode of communication. In general, any network topology may be used. Information (e.g., data, software 920, etc.) may be communicated to and/or from computer system 900 via network interface device 940.

Computer system 900 may further include a video display adapter 952 for communicating a displayable image to a display device, such as display device 936. Examples of a display device include, but are not limited to, a liquid crystal display (LCD), a cathode ray tube (CRT), a plasma display, a light emitting diode (LED) display, and any combinations thereof. Display adapter 952 and display device 936 may be utilized in combination with processor 904 to provide graphical representations of aspects of the present disclosure. In addition to a display device, computer system 900 may include one or more other peripheral output devices including, but not limited to, an audio speaker, a printer, and any combinations thereof. Such peripheral output devices may be connected to bus 912 via a peripheral interface 956. Examples of a peripheral interface include, but are not limited to, a serial port, a USB connection, a FIREWIRE connection, a parallel connection, and any combinations thereof.

The foregoing has been a detailed description of illustrative embodiments of the invention. Various modifications and additions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. Features of each of the various embodiments described above may be combined with features of other described embodiments as appropriate in order to provide a multiplicity of feature combinations in associated new embodiments. Furthermore, while the foregoing describes a number of separate embodiments, what has been described herein is merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. Additionally, although particular methods herein may be illustrated and/or described as being performed in a specific order, the ordering is highly variable within ordinary skill to achieve methods, systems, and software according to the present disclosure. Accordingly, this description is meant to be taken only by way of example, and not to otherwise limit the scope of this invention.

Exemplary embodiments have been disclosed above and illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, omissions and additions may be made to that which is specifically disclosed herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for a verification of an aircraft component using an immutable sequential listing, the system comprises a computing device, wherein the computing device comprises: a processor; and a memory in communication with the processor, wherein the memory comprises instructions configuring the processor to: identify an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components, wherein each aircraft component of the plurality of aircraft components is associated with a component identifier; and verify the aircraft component on the immutable sequential listing as a function of the component identifier using an aircraft component classifier, wherein the aircraft component classifier is derived from aircraft component training data, which includes a plurality of classifier inputs that are correlated to a plurality of aircraft component outputs.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein: each component of the plurality of aircraft components is included in an aircraft of a plurality of aircraft; and the processor is configured to identify each aircraft of the plurality of aircraft.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein verifying the aircraft component on an immutable sequential listing includes verifying data on the immutable sequence entry.
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the component identifier includes a serial number.
 5. The system of claim 1, wherein verifying the aircraft component further comprises: receiving a component manufacturing record; and verifying the aircraft component on the immutable sequential listing as a function of the component manufacturing record.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein verifying the aircraft component further comprises: receiving a component maintenance record; and verifying the aircraft component on the immutable sequential listing as a function of the component maintenance record.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein verifying the aircraft component further comprises: receiving a component incident record; and verifying the aircraft component on the immutable sequential listing as a function of the component incident record; wherein the component incident record comprises a failure datum associated with the aircraft component.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein verifying the aircraft component further comprises: receiving an aircraft maintenance record; and verifying the aircraft component on the immutable sequential listing as a function of the aircraft maintenance record.
 9. The system of claim 1, wherein verifying the aircraft component further comprises: receiving an aircraft incident record; and verifying the aircraft component on the immutable sequential listing as a function of the aircraft incident record.
 10. A method for a verification of an aircraft component using an immutable sequential listing, the method comprising: identifying, at a computing device, an aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components, wherein each aircraft component of a plurality of aircraft components is associated with a component identifier; and verifying, at the computing device, the aircraft component on the immutable sequential listing as a function of the component identifier using an aircraft component classifier, wherein the aircraft component classifier is derived from aircraft component training data, which includes a plurality of classifier inputs that are correlated to a plurality of aircraft component outputs.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein: each component of the plurality of aircraft components is included in an aircraft of a plurality of aircraft; and the computing device is configured to identify each aircraft of the plurality of aircraft.
 12. The method of claim 10, wherein verifying the aircraft component on the immutable sequential listing includes verifying data on an immutable sequence entry.
 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the component identifier includes a serial number.
 14. The method of claim 10, wherein verifying the aircraft component further comprises: receiving a component manufacturing record; and verifying the aircraft component on the immutable sequential listing as a function of the component manufacturing record.
 15. The method of claim 10, wherein verifying the aircraft component further comprises: receiving a component maintenance record; and verifying the aircraft component on the immutable sequential listing as a function of the component maintenance record.
 16. The method of claim 10, wherein verifying the aircraft component further comprises: receiving a component incident record; and verifying the aircraft component on the immutable sequential listing as a function of the component incident record.
 17. The method of claim 10, wherein verifying the aircraft component further comprises: receiving an aircraft maintenance record; and verifying the aircraft component on the immutable sequential listing as a function of the aircraft maintenance record.
 18. The method of claim 10, wherein verifying the aircraft component further comprises: receiving an aircraft incident record; and verifying the aircraft component on the immutable sequential listing as a function of the aircraft incident record.
 19. The system of claim 1, wherein verifying the aircraft component comprises comparing the aircraft component identifier to acceptance criteria.
 20. The method of claim 10, wherein verifying the aircraft component comprises comparing the aircraft component identifier to acceptance criteria. 